[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ikumasa Mukai updated MAHOUT-943:
-
Attachment: MAHOUT-943.patch
I made a patch.
Following Deneche-san's advice, I added a mechanism
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13193539#comment-13193539
]
Ted Dunning commented on MAHOUT-959:
{quote}
It seemed strange that you have the possi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13193462#comment-13193462
]
Rares Vernica commented on MAHOUT-959:
--
bq. The vectors are most certainly read back
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13193449#comment-13193449
]
Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-959:
--
No, this is wrong. The vectors are most certainly rea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13193420#comment-13193420
]
Rares Vernica commented on MAHOUT-959:
--
My original vectors are floats and after they
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13193407#comment-13193407
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov commented on MAHOUT-959:
-
bq. There is no way of knowing that it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13193405#comment-13193405
]
Rares Vernica commented on MAHOUT-959:
--
OK, I see. I agree that VectorWritable is jus
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Suneel Marthi updated MAHOUT-956:
-
Attachment: (was: RowIdJob.java)
> RowIdJob fails if logsCRCfilter is not set.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Suneel Marthi updated MAHOUT-956:
-
Attachment: MAHOUT-956.patch
> RowIdJob fails if logsCRCfilter is not set.
>
959 is out of code freeze list now. Sorry for noise on the thread.
-d
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote:
> i am seeking more input on 959 now after looking at it in more
> details. I will not be committing it unless convinced that patch
> actually has value. I believe as it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13193386#comment-13193386
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov commented on MAHOUT-959:
-
yes, agree with Sean.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov updated MAHOUT-959:
Attachment: MAHOUT-959.patch
for illustrative purposes, i am enclosing my version of the is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Owen updated MAHOUT-959:
-
Resolution: Not A Problem
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.7)
(was: 0.6)
i am seeking more input on 959 now after looking at it in more
details. I will not be committing it unless convinced that patch
actually has value. I believe as it is now, it is switching
serialization behavior to one not desired by default.
-d
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13193369#comment-13193369
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov commented on MAHOUT-959:
-
another way to handle it is perhaps to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13193366#comment-13193366
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov commented on MAHOUT-959:
-
Hm. After applying the patch and lookin
and 959, testing it...
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Jeff Eastman
wrote:
> I'd say continue to fix straightforward defects while Shannon gets into the
> RC-1 build. IIRC, we've never managed to release an RC-1 so even if the
> fixes miss it they will likely be in 0.6
>
>
> On 1/25/12 2:01 PM,
I'd say continue to fix straightforward defects while Shannon gets into
the RC-1 build. IIRC, we've never managed to release an RC-1 so even if
the fixes miss it they will likely be in 0.6
On 1/25/12 2:01 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
I wonder what others think of a couple of issues that have pop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov reassigned MAHOUT-959:
---
Assignee: Dmitriy Lyubimov
> VectorWritable does not preserve the laxPrecision fl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13193329#comment-13193329
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov commented on MAHOUT-959:
-
Ok, i will push it tonight.
Thanks to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doug Mittendorf updated MAHOUT-960:
---
Attachment: MAHOUT-960.patch
> Reduce memory usage of ImplicitFeedbackAlternatingLeastSqu
Reduce memory usage of ImplicitFeedbackAlternatingLeastSquaresSolver
Key: MAHOUT-960
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-960
Project: Mahout
Issue Type: Impro
I wonder what others think of a couple of issues that have popped up recently
related to some stuff that is new to 0.6, namely:
M-957 and fixing a minor thing on M-939.
I think I can get to them tonight or tomorrow.
On Jan 25, 2012, at 3:20 PM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
> Definitely. I'm glad the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Suneel Marthi updated MAHOUT-956:
-
Attachment: RowIdJob.java
fixed patch for Mahout-956
> RowIdJob fails if logsCRC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Suneel Marthi updated MAHOUT-956:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Pass in PathFilters.logCRCFilters as parameter when converti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Eastman updated MAHOUT-959:
Fix Version/s: 0.6
This is a very simple patch and I'm ok with slipping it under the wire for 0.6.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13193292#comment-13193292
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov commented on MAHOUT-959:
-
looks simple enough. if it is ok, i'd c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov updated MAHOUT-959:
Fix Version/s: 0.7
tentatively putting it on the 0.7 roadmap as 0.6 is currently under free
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rares Vernica updated MAHOUT-959:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
The attached patch fixes the issue.
> Vecto
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rares Vernica updated MAHOUT-959:
-
Attachment: VerctorWritable-laxPrecicison.patch
Patch from trunk against revision 1235897 that fi
Definitely. I'm glad there's an explicit guide to follow, though I may still
have questions in the next few days.
I'll get started on it today.
iPhone'd
On Jan 25, 2012, at 13:29, Jeff Eastman wrote:
> Thanks for the link Sean, I though this had been documented but could not
> find the page
VectorWritable does not preserve the laxPrecision flag
--
Key: MAHOUT-959
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-959
Project: Mahout
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Math
Thanks for the link Sean, I though this had been documented but could
not find the page. Now I see it is accessed from the Documentation tab
on the Mahout website and not from any of the Developer Resources links
on that page.
Shannon, not to put you on the spot, but "build-meister" == "releas
(moving to user@)
I think I understand more about what you are doing. It doesn't quite make
sense to say you will train a recommender on the output of the recommender,
but I understand that you mean you have some information about what users
have visited what attractions or shows.
This is classic
Putting back on the list, we want to recommend new items in the park, an item
could be:1) attraction2) restaurant3) show4) Ride5) resort
Our real data if you will is the recommendations that result from understanding
their preferences in more detail based on their reservations and resort stays.
I've kept this up to date, so works as far as I know:
https://cwiki.apache.org/MAHOUT/how-to-release.html
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
> +dev@
>
> Didn't notice this was sent to me directly and not via dev@. Can somebody
> who understands the release process outline what
The user's preferences directly influence the recommendations of course --
what do you mean?
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Saikat Kanjilal wrote:
> Sean,
> Thanks for responding, I understand now , since the item based
> recommendations would be disjoint is there anyway to have the user
> pref
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3625/
---
Review request for mahout and Grant Ingersoll.
Summary
---
Review request f
Sean,
Thanks for responding, I understand now , since the item based recommendations
would be disjoint is there anyway to have the user preferences influence the
recommendations returned or is there no relation at all between these two.
Regards
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 25, 2012, at 7:12 AM,
+dev@
Didn't notice this was sent to me directly and not via dev@. Can
somebody who understands the release process outline what it entails?
Original Message
Subject:Re: [VOTE] Code Freeze for Mahout 0.6
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:34:15 -0700
From: Jeff Eastman
To
Not sure what you mean, the recommendations ought to be disjoint from
existing preferred items, so what is the intersection's purpose?
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Saikat Kanjilal wrote:
> Hi All,
> We've built a prototype recommendations engine using the taste item
> similarity algorithms an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reassigned MAHOUT-957:
--
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> term vectors not created in SparseVectorsFromSequenceFi
Hi All,
We've built a prototype recommendations engine using the taste item similarity
algorithms and have wrapped this around a Rest API. I have also written code
to basically take the mathematical intersection of the recommendations returned
from taste with the actual user preferences both of
Are you using Lucene 3.4? I had this problem as well and I believe
this was because of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3442
which is fixed in Lucene 3.5.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Michael Kazekin
wrote:
> Frank, I tried to use BooleanQuery, comprising of several TermQueries (t
Frank, I tried to use BooleanQuery, comprising of several TermQueries
(these represent key:value constraints, where key is the field name, for
example "lang:en"),
but the Scorer, created by Weight in your code, is null. Do you know,
what could be wrong here?
Sorry to bother you on dev list wit
45 matches
Mail list logo
