Re: CMS UI Error in 800X600 Resolution

Hi, Yes. I'm about to send a patch for that very soon :) Cheers, Nicolas. On Jan 4, 2014 7:48 AM, "Chameera Wijebandara" < chameerawijeband...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > OS : Ubuntu 13.10 > Screen Resolution : 800X600 > Browser : Chrome, Firefox > > I have try to acces http://mahout.apache.

CMS UI Error in 800X600 Resolution

Hi All, OS : Ubuntu 13.10 Screen Resolution : 800X600 Browser : Chrome, Firefox I have try to acces http://mahout.apache.org/ in aboue conditions. But UI does not display correctly and the menu bar does not react for the mouse actions. Thanks, Chameera

Re: CMS Redesign for better usability

+1 for the new design. On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > Much better. > > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Sotiris Salloumis wrote: > > > Sorry for that please check here http://www.eprice.gr/mahout_cms.png > > > > > > > > *From:* Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com]

Re: CMS Redesign for better usability

Much better. On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Sotiris Salloumis wrote: > Sorry for that please check here http://www.eprice.gr/mahout_cms.png > > > > *From:* Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Saturday, January 04, 2014 12:22 AM > *To:* Mahout Dev List; i...@eprice.gr > *Subje

RE: CMS Redesign for better usability

Sorry for that please check here http://www.eprice.gr/mahout_cms.png From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2014 12:22 AM To: Mahout Dev List; i...@eprice.gr Subject: Re: CMS Redesign for better usability Attachments are stripped by the mailing li

Re: CMS Redesign for better usability

Attachments are stripped by the mailing list software. Can you post your thumbnails somewhere (pastebin, dropbox, anywhere)? On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Sotiris Salloumis wrote: > Hi all, > > > > Going through the pages I believe it will increase usability the removal > of the yellow ban

CMS Redesign for better usability

Hi all, Going through the pages I believe it will increase usability the removal of the yellow banner, which takes 1/3 of the screen for no obvious reason. I'm attaching a design screenshot to understand the difference ( the message has been moved in the white space near the search form)

Re: Deprecated or drafts only algorithms what is the reasoning?

a) Implemented code exists in trunk for the ones that need to be retained, so you can retain the Wiki pages for those. b) The ones that have been deprecated, please purge the corresponding Wiki pages. The release notes for 0.9 will capture the reasons for the deprecation. On Friday, Januar

[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-1369) Why does theta normalization for naive bayes classification commented out?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13861943#comment-13861943 ] Suneel Marthi commented on MAHOUT-1369: --- This seems to have been commented out as p

RE: Deprecated or drafts only algorithms what is the reasoning?

Thanks, Please clarify for the ones retained which label to use. I believe we should remove the team Deprecated and either: 1) Use the term draft to distinguish from fully supported or .. 2) . to commit the algorithms included in the trunk will be fully supported. Plea

Re: Deprecated or drafts only algorithms what is the reasoning?

On Friday, January 3, 2014 4:38 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > > > > > > PCA should probably be rewritten to point to SSVD with PCA options (SSVD > solver includes end2end PCA functionality) > > > If the Wiki for SSVD already covers SSVD

Re: Deprecated or drafts only algorithms what is the reasoning?

On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > > > > > > PCA should probably be rewritten to point to SSVD with PCA options (SSVD > solver includes end2end PCA functionality) > > > If the Wiki for SSVD already covers SSVD with PCA options, may be it may > make sense to purge the older PCA

Re: Deprecated or drafts only algorithms what is the reasoning?

On Friday, January 3, 2014 4:26 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > See inline. The code for the deprecated algos has already been purged from > trunk, its only the Wiki that needs cleaning up. > > > > > On Friday, January 3, 2014 4:03 PM, "i.

Re: Streaming KMeans clustering

There is no combiner in the present implementation.  Moreover the codepath that's executed when 'reduceStreamingKMeans' -rskm flag is set does not have adequate test coverage and needs to be tested more extensively. Most of the issues I had been seeing were due to specifying -rskm flag.  Amir

Re: Deprecated or drafts only algorithms what is the reasoning?

On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > See inline. The code for the deprecated algos has already been purged from > trunk, its only the Wiki that needs cleaning up. > > > > > On Friday, January 3, 2014 4:03 PM, "i...@eprice.gr" > wrote: > > Please confirm if below list is correct

Re: Deprecated or drafts only algorithms what is the reasoning?

See inline. The code for the deprecated algos has already been purged from trunk, its only the Wiki that needs cleaning up. On Friday, January 3, 2014 4:03 PM, "i...@eprice.gr" wrote: Please confirm if below list  is correct before removing them:   Classification Deprecated or drafts only:

RE: Deprecated or drafts only algorithms what is the reasoning?

Please confirm if below list is correct before removing them: Classification Deprecated or drafts only: * Support Vector Machines (see MAHOUT-14 ,

Re: Deprecated or drafts only algorithms what is the reasoning?

It could be because:- a) they have been replaced by better performant alternatives b) lack of usage c) lack of support Please delete from wiki all algorithms that have been marked deprecated (the code for most of them has already been removed from trunk). On Friday, January 3, 2014 3:31 P

Deprecated or drafts only algorithms what is the reasoning?

Hi all, I'm going through the algorithms and I noticed some are "Deprecated or drafts only" . What is the reason? Is it because they are less efficient compared to the supported ones or is it due to lack of resources working on them to be supported with Mahout? Thanks Sotiris

RE: new Mahout book

Hi all, For future contributors in the link given below http://cms.apache.org a popup will appear just put "anonymous" (without the brackets) and press enter. Regards Sotiris -Original Message- From: Isabel Drost-Fromm [mailto:isa...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 10:43 P

[jira] [Comment Edited] (MAHOUT-1305) Rework the wiki

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13861764#comment-13861764 ] Dmitriy Lyubimov edited comment on MAHOUT-1305 at 1/3/14 6:50 PM: -

[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-1305) Rework the wiki

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13861764#comment-13861764 ] Dmitriy Lyubimov commented on MAHOUT-1305: -- By all means I agree. I also still

Re: Getting Involved

Done Sory for the mistack http://chameerawijebandara.wordpress.com/2014/01/03/install-mahout-in-ubuntu-for-beginners/ Thanks Chameera On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > Can you change the link? That is important for search purposes. > > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 6:51 AM,

Re: Getting Involved

Can you change the link? That is important for search purposes. On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Chameera Wijebandara < chameerawijeband...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nicolas, > I have changed the title. But not the link. > > http://chameerawijebandara.wordpress.com/2014/01/03/install-mahout-in-ubuntu-

Re: Getting Involved

Nicolas, I have changed the title. But not the link. http://chameerawijebandara.wordpress.com/2014/01/03/install-mahout-in-ubuntu-for-biginers/ Thanks Chameera On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Nicolas Embleton wrote: > Hi Chameera, > > Is the link still the Same? Or did you change "bigin

Re: Getting Involved

Hi Chameera, Is the link still the Same? Or did you change "biginer" to "beginner"? Cheers, Nicolas. On Jan 3, 2014 3:37 PM, "Chameera Wijebandara" < chameerawijeband...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > I have corrected my post as you suggested. > Thanks for your support. > > Thanks > Chameera

Re: Getting Involved

Hi All, I have corrected my post as you suggested. Thanks for your support. Thanks Chameera On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Chameera Wijebandara < chameerawijeband...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nicolas, > I have written only the build part of Mahout. So I think it is good > for beginners. Should

Re: Getting Involved

Nicolas, I have written only the build part of Mahout. So I think it is good for beginners. Should the title be changed? Thank you very much your interest. Sebastian, Thank you very much for your considaration on my article. I am bit poor on English. As you suggest I correct them as soon as possib

Re: Getting Involved

Hi, Good contribution! I propose you redirect the reader to this link: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Java for the "Java installation" part. Then they will get more information and possibly more accurate (that will be updated over time!). Also I think the prerequisite is Java 1.6, not 1.7 (acco

Re: Getting Involved

Very useful, we should link to it from our wiki! I have one suggestion, have the users build mahout with mvn -DskipTests install instead of mvn install, otherwise they have to wait for the tests to finish, which is awfully long and not necessary if you didn't change anything. Furthermore, I coll

Re: Getting Involved

Pardon me for being picky but could you write "beginner" as such? :) (+ the article itself has multiple typos) That said, it's a very useful article. I think I saw another one with Ubuntu recently too. On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Chameera Wijebandara < chameerawijeband...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: Getting Involved

Hi All, I have wrote simple blog post explaining how configure Mahout in Ubuntu. Can you please tell me are there any thing to improve in this blog post. http://chameerawijebandara.wordpress.com/2014/01/