Jenkins build became unstable: Mahout-h1-Quality #253

See

[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-1877) Switch to Flink 1.1.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15412805#comment-15412805 ] Hudson commented on MAHOUT-1877: FAILURE: Integrated in Mahout-Quality #3382 (See [https

Build failed in Jenkins: Mahout-Quality #3382

See Changes: [smarthi] MAHOUT-1877: Switch to Flink 1.1.0, this closes apache/mahout#249 -- [...truncated 109761 lines...] 08/09/2016 01:34:37 Reduce(Reduce at org.apache.mahout.flinkbindings

[jira] [Resolved] (MAHOUT-1742) non-legacy framework related issues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suneel Marthi resolved MAHOUT-1742. --- Resolution: Implemented > non-legacy framework related issues > -

[jira] [Resolved] (MAHOUT-1877) Switch to Flink 1.1.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suneel Marthi resolved MAHOUT-1877. --- Resolution: Implemented > Switch to Flink 1.1.0 > - > > K

[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-1877) Switch to Flink 1.1.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15412723#comment-15412723 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on MAHOUT-1877: Github user asfgit closed the pull reque

[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-1877) Switch to Flink 1.1.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15412688#comment-15412688 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on MAHOUT-1877: GitHub user smarthi opened a pull reques

[jira] [Created] (MAHOUT-1877) Switch to Flink 1.1.0

Suneel Marthi created MAHOUT-1877: - Summary: Switch to Flink 1.1.0 Key: MAHOUT-1877 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1877 Project: Mahout Issue Type: Improvement Co

Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility

Done. Closed it. On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > We can't drop support for Java 7 yet, so I would suggest that u close the > PR for Lucene 6. > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Andrew Palumbo wrote: > > > Thanks Raviteja, > > > > > > Someone will review the PR shortly. >

[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-1876) Mahout fails to read from lucene index of solr-6.1.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15412197#comment-15412197 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on MAHOUT-1876: Github user bond- commented on the issue

[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-1876) Mahout fails to read from lucene index of solr-6.1.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15412198#comment-15412198 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on MAHOUT-1876: Github user bond- closed the pull reques

Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility

Hi Andy, Yep no issues with the runs in cluster in both the patches. Only difference is the Java version compatibility. - https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/247 - Lucene 6.1.0 - Works with Java 8 and above - The Hadoop cluster should also be running on Java 8 and above - h

Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility

We can't drop support for Java 7 yet, so I would suggest that u close the PR for Lucene 6. On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Andrew Palumbo wrote: > Thanks Raviteja, > > > Someone will review the PR shortly. > > > And these ran w/o issue for you in cluster mode, correct? > > > Andy > > ___

Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility

Thanks Raviteja, Someone will review the PR shortly. And these ran w/o issue for you in cluster mode, correct? Andy From: Raviteja Lokineni Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 9:01:08 PM To: mahout Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility Submitted another