[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-917) Build takes too long

2012-06-22 Thread Sebastian Schelter (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13399264#comment-13399264 ] Sebastian Schelter commented on MAHOUT-917: --- I'd vote for 'Not a Problem' on thi

[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-917) Build takes too long

2012-06-22 Thread Sebastian Schelter (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13399263#comment-13399263 ] Sebastian Schelter commented on MAHOUT-917: --- I'm not sure this is really an issu

Re: [jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-917) Build takes too long

2011-12-12 Thread Ted Dunning
This is much less true when applied to map-reduce programs. The point of scalability is that the code, well, scales. As such, with a few caveats testing small is actually pretty similar to testing large. This isn't quite try when it comes to convergence rates and such, but basic function should

Re: [jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-917) Build takes too long

2011-12-12 Thread Lance Norskog
The current unit tests and small-scale end-to-end tests are fine. Maybe a few could be trimmed down. Some of the long-running ones use fair-sized datasets to verify that they crunch numbers correctly. Mahout has some algorithms for which a realistic test should take a few hours and several servers

Re: [jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-917) Build takes too long

2011-12-12 Thread Isabel Drost
On 08.12.2011 Lance Norskog wrote: > Given all this (especially the third), a separate Maven sub-project makes > more sense; it should not be part of the default build. It may just be my personal preference, but I prefer having unit test accompany the maven module they test. That also makes check

[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-917) Build takes too long

2011-12-08 Thread Ted Dunning (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13165877#comment-13165877 ] Ted Dunning commented on MAHOUT-917: I think that the vectorizer tests could be augmen

Re: [jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-917) Build takes too long

2011-12-08 Thread Lance Norskog
1) What does 'nightly' mean to 'mvn install'? 2) These algorithms are intended to run with full-size data, and their output is approximate. There is no point in running them on toy data. They should be run on real data with expected ranges of output, and sometimes non-trivial code to check those ou

[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-917) Build takes too long

2011-12-08 Thread Jake Mannix (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13165354#comment-13165354 ] Jake Mannix commented on MAHOUT-917: Yeah, the new LDA integration test is just slow.

[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-917) Build takes too long

2011-12-08 Thread Grant Ingersoll (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13165217#comment-13165217 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on MAHOUT-917: Seems a lot of the overhead is simply due

[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-917) Build takes too long

2011-12-08 Thread Grant Ingersoll (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13165208#comment-13165208 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on MAHOUT-917: We really should solve MAHOUT-916 and see

[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-917) Build takes too long

2011-12-08 Thread Grant Ingersoll (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13165207#comment-13165207 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on MAHOUT-917: https://builds.apache.org/job/Mahout-Qual

[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-917) Build takes too long

2011-12-07 Thread Grant Ingersoll (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13164382#comment-13164382 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on MAHOUT-917: But, also agree w/ Sean, we should look t

[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-917) Build takes too long

2011-12-07 Thread Grant Ingersoll (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13164380#comment-13164380 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on MAHOUT-917: I think we should make MahoutTestCase ext

Re: [jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-917) Build takes too long

2011-12-06 Thread Lance Norskog
mvn -DskipTests=true clean install It's only a few minutes on my 3-yr-old laptop. The tests should be split into 'unit' (smoke) tests and numerical quality tests. The latter are what take the time, and some have been 'compromised' in order to fit the unit test mold. I think they should all run as

[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-917) Build takes too long

2011-12-06 Thread Sean Owen (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13163866#comment-13163866 ] Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-917: -- I don't know if it's so hard... a few tests have been

[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-917) Build takes too long

2011-12-06 Thread Isabel Drost (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13163857#comment-13163857 ] Isabel Drost commented on MAHOUT-917: - As much as I would like to see those long runni