I consider this as a tiny step of a larger making-it-more-usable action.
Ted,
I actually started this to evaluate my implementation of factorization
machines, I'm going to write about it after trying on some data on the thread
you started, we could talk about details there.
About data tools,
I differ a bit in that these are important to have in general.
Unfortunately, however, our current command line structure would make these
really inefficient to use.
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Sebastian Schelter
wrote:
> In general, I think it is great to have such tools. But they should
In general, I think it is great to have such tools. But they should be
developed in context with a specific algorithm or problem.
On 06.04.2013 17:47, Gokhan Capan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are you guys interested in Weka like filters implementation,
> like NominalToBinary, Discretize etc.
>
> I started
Hi,
Are you guys interested in Weka like filters implementation,
like NominalToBinary, Discretize etc.
I started to implement in-memory versions running on Mahout Matrix, and
plan to extend the implementations so they could run on sequence files of
IntWritable, VectorWritable pairs.
--
Gokhan
