ivial.
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
>
>
> Original message
> From: Pat Ferrel
> Date: 07/07/2017 10:35 PM (GMT-08:00)
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Cc: Holden Karau , u...@mahout.apache.org,
> Dmitriy Lyubimov , Andrew
...@mahout.apache.org, Dmitriy
Lyubimov , Andrew Palumbo
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Naming convention for multiple spark/scala combos
IIRC these all fit sbt’s conventons?
On Jul 7, 2017, at 2:05 PM, Trevor Grant wrote:
So to tie all of this together-
org.apache.mahout:mahout-spark_2.10:0.13.1_spark_1_6
k the _spark1 / _spark2 is probably the right way (or
> _spark_1 / _spark_2 is fine too).
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Trevor Grant
> wrote:
>
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Andrew Palumbo
>> Date: Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 12:28 PM
>> Subj
martphone
> >
> >
> > Original message
> > From: Holden Karau
> > Date: 07/07/2017 1:24 PM (GMT-08:00)
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Cc: Trevor Grant
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Naming convention for multiple spark/scala combos
> &g
/ _spark_2 is fine too).
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Trevor Grant
> wrote:
>
> >
> > -- Forwarded message --
> > From: Andrew Palumbo
> > Date: Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 12:28 PM
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Naming convention for multiple s
Welcome!
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
Original message
From: Holden Karau
Date: 07/07/2017 1:24 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Cc: Trevor Grant
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Naming convention for multiple spark/scala combos
Trevor looped me in on
17 at 11:43 AM, Trevor Grant
> wrote:
>
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Andrew Palumbo
>> Date: Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 12:28 PM
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Naming convention for multiple spark/scala combos
>> To: "dev@mahout.apache.org
s probably the right way (or
_spark_1 / _spark_2 is fine too).
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Trevor Grant
wrote:
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Andrew Palumbo
> Date: Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 12:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Naming convention for
another option for artifact names (using jars for example here):
mahout-spark-2.11_2.10-0.13.1.jar
mahout-spark-2.11_2.11-0.13.1.jar
mahout-math-scala-2.11_2.10-0.13.1.jar
i.e. ---.jar
not exactly pretty.. I somewhat prefer Trevor's idea of Dl4j convention.
F
it would seem 2nd option is preferable if doable. Any option that has most
desirable combinations prebuilt, is preferable i guess. Spark itself also
releases tons of hadoop profile binary variations. so i don't have to build
one myself.
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Trevor Grant
wrote:
> Hey a
10 matches
Mail list logo
