Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 1.6, RC1

2014-04-30 Thread Karl Wright
I believe it is time to close the vote. Ahmet? Karl On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: Ran all the tests. +1 from me. Piergiorgio 2014-04-24 17:41 GMT+02:00 Minoru Osuka minoru.os...@gmail.com: Hi, Ran test. +1 from me.

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 1.6, RC1

2014-04-30 Thread Ahmet Arslan
Hi, Five +1's, 2 weeks. The vote succeeded. Thanks to all for voting! Ahmet On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 1:09 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: I believe it is time to close the vote.  Ahmet? Karl On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 1.6, RC1

2014-04-28 Thread Piergiorgio Lucidi
Ran all the tests. +1 from me. Piergiorgio 2014-04-24 17:41 GMT+02:00 Minoru Osuka minoru.os...@gmail.com: Hi, Ran test. +1 from me. Thanks, Minoru On Apr 22, 2014, at 18:40, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: I also added, for the main English site, a release verification

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 1.6, RC1

2014-04-24 Thread Karl Wright
FWIW, I just checked signatures, while confirming the accuracy of the verify.xml page. They check out also. I'd suggest that everyone who wants to check this release out do it soon; we probably want to close the vote somewhere around Monday or Tuesday. Erlend, have you had a chance to look at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 1.6, RC1

2014-04-24 Thread Minoru Osuka
Hi, Ran test. +1 from me. Thanks, Minoru On Apr 22, 2014, at 18:40, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: I also added, for the main English site, a release verification page stub, called verify.xml, which is linked from the download page. If you would like to fill out how to verify a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 1.6, RC1

2014-04-22 Thread Karl Wright
I also added, for the main English site, a release verification page stub, called verify.xml, which is linked from the download page. If you would like to fill out how to verify a release now, that would be great. Thanks! Karl On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 1.6, RC1

2014-04-17 Thread Ahmet Arslan
Hi, * ant all * mvn package  * MD5, SHA512 (hashes) and GPG (signature) verification on artifacts passes for me. Here is my +1. I created check_signatures.sh that performs MD5, SHA512 (hashes) and GPG (signature) verification on artifacts. Somehow analogous to lucene/solr's

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 1.6, RC1

2014-04-17 Thread Karl Wright
Please feel free to check in your scripts directly into the release-scripts directory. Thanks! Karl On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, * ant all * mvn package * MD5, SHA512 (hashes) and GPG (signature) verification on artifacts passes for me.

[VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 1.6, RC1

2014-04-16 Thread Ahmet Arslan
Hello, Please vote on whether to release Apache ManifoldCF 1.6, RC1.  This is obviously a major release, so voting will remain open for two weeks, unless the RC is respun.  Artifacts can be downloaded from:  http://people.apache.org/~iorixxx/apache-manifoldcf-1.6-RC1/  There is also a release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 1.6, RC1

2014-04-16 Thread Karl Wright
Hi Ahmet, The signature files, as I feared, are in an incorrect format. I created ticket CONNECTORS-926 for this issue, and provided examples of correct format MD5 and SHA file contents. I did not check .ASC, but you'll probably want to confirm that too. -1 from me for RC1 for this reason.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 1.6, RC1

2014-04-16 Thread Karl Wright
Since, in another thread, we've concluded that it is OK to release with gpg signatures rather than pgp signatures, I withdraw my -1. I still need to check the candidate though before granting +1. On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ahmet, The signature

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 1.6, RC1

2014-04-16 Thread Karl Wright
Ran all tests. +1 from me. Karl On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Since, in another thread, we've concluded that it is OK to release with gpg signatures rather than pgp signatures, I withdraw my -1. I still need to check the candidate though before