I came up with another way of selecting between operational modes. This
way will work properly for use with the extracting update handler, but may
not work right with the standard update handler.
I'm going to put a release candidate up anyway, since I'm not hearing back
from the SolrJ people.
I posted to d...@lucene.apache.org describing the problem, and committed a
fix that allowed the integration test to pass. Basically, if the URL
required is more than 4000 characters, it will use multipart post.
Otherwise it will do whatever SolrJ wants.
I am still very concerned that there are a
Canceling due to problems with Solr connector.
Karl
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 9:35 AM Julien Massiera <
julien.massi...@francelabs.com> wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> I understand that the piece of code involved is exactly the same as the
> one in the SolrJ API, which is the "reference" way of coding.
>
>
Hi Karl,
I understand that the piece of code involved is exactly the same as the
one in the SolrJ API, which is the "reference" way of coding.
Let me explain again the different steps of my tests :
1) I configured a job to crawl a winshare repository containing 3 files
and ingesting them
Hi Julien,
I verified that the integration test in question confirms the following:
(a) that the right number of documents were processed, and that (b) there
were no errors reported during the processing. So unless the failure is
indeed a silent one, and documents are simply not getting
Julien,
Integration tests do cover indexing via SolrJ, and they do succeed.
(That's how I found the deletion bug FWIW). I therefore need more
information about the specific failure symptom you are seeing before I'll
withdraw the candidate. If it's a silent failure that's one thing but if
you
-1 ref : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-1533
Julien
On 20/09/2018 10:38, Karl Wright wrote:
All tests pass, artifacts look good.
+1 from me.
Karl
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 9:57 PM Karl Wright wrote:
Please vote on whether to release ManifoldCF 2.11, RC1. This release
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 2:08:27 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 2.11, RC1
All tests pass, artifacts look good.
+1 from me.
Karl
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 9:57 PM Karl Wright wrote:
> Please vote on whether to release ManifoldCF 2.11, RC1. This release
> conta
All tests pass, artifacts look good.
+1 from me.
Karl
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 9:57 PM Karl Wright wrote:
> Please vote on whether to release ManifoldCF 2.11, RC1. This release
> contains a number of fixes/improvements/additions, described in the
> CHANGES.txt file. In addition, it includes
Please vote on whether to release ManifoldCF 2.11, RC1. This release
contains a number of fixes/improvements/additions, described in the
CHANGES.txt file. In addition, it includes Tika 1.19, which has a number
of fixes for classpath issues specifically requested by ManifoldCF.
This fixes a
10 matches
Mail list logo
