Re: Help! Has anyone ever used log4j 2 before?

No; I simply called it "logging.properties". But I am certain that the file was read and used as a properties file (that was easy to figure out). Karl On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Furkan KAMACI wrote: > Hi Karl, > > Just to double check: did you named properties

Re: Help! Has anyone ever used log4j 2 before?

Hi Karl, Just to double check: did you named properties file as log4j2.properties? Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > FWIW, it turns out that I could not get a .properties configuration to > work. But I was able to get an

Re: Help! Has anyone ever used log4j 2 before?

FWIW, it turns out that I could not get a .properties configuration to work. But I was able to get an XML configuration to work, so I switched to that. Karl On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > Yes, of course. > Karl > > On Apr 16, 2017 8:15 AM, "Furkan

Re: Help! Has anyone ever used log4j 2 before?

Yes, of course. Karl On Apr 16, 2017 8:15 AM, "Furkan KAMACI" wrote: > Hi Karl, > > Did you check here: > https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/migration.html > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Karl Wright

Re: Help! Has anyone ever used log4j 2 before?

Hi Karl, Did you check here: https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/migration.html Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm in the process of migrating MCF to log4j 2, but I am having a lot of > trouble getting

Help! Has anyone ever used log4j 2 before?

Hi all, I'm in the process of migrating MCF to log4j 2, but I am having a lot of trouble getting it to work at all. This is where things stand: (1) I had to change the name of our logging file from logging.ini to logging.properties, because otherwise it attempts to interpret it as XML; (2) The