Re: [Marketing] CTO article

2005-10-20 Thread Ian Lynch
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 12:20 +0200, Charles-H.Schulz wrote: > Hello Ian, > Although these things are hard to get (one of my friend who is totally > foreign to FLOSS and OOo matters tells me to contact OEMs repeatedly :-) > ) Its rather surprising that OEM retailers will pay $10 for MS Works when t

Re: [Marketing] It₼s hard to beat Office king

2005-10-20 Thread Ian Lynch
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 07:48 -0400, Chad Smith wrote: > On 10/18/05, Jonathon Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Still want to claim that OOo uses less resources? > > > OOo uses a lot more resources - and it's slower. No questions there. It > amazes me how open source promoters talk about

[Marketing] Testing required for new bittorrent site

2005-10-20 Thread Deepankar Datta
Hi I was wondering if everyone could take a look at the new test bittorrent site at http://distribution.openoffice.org/p2p/testsite/ This has a much simpler method of selecting downloads, and shows the torrents of additional languages. I hope to move the bittorrent site to this soon, but as

[Marketing] Demand OpenDocument! Sign the petition.

2005-10-20 Thread Daniel Carrera
Hello all, Microsoft has said that they will support OpenDocument in MS Office if there is customer demand for it. The OpenDocument Fellowship has started a petition for Microsoft to support OpenDocument. To show that there /is/ demand for OpenDocument: http://opendocumentfellowship.org/pet

Re: [Marketing] It₼s hard to beat Office king

2005-10-20 Thread Chad Smith
On 10/19/05, Tom Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >Let me explain how keeping an existing office suite) would indeed > cost less than OpenOffice.org. > > > >1) The existing infrastructure is already in place. This can be handled by cascading servers to upgrade software > automatically i

[Marketing] OpenDoc plug-in for MS Office users

2005-10-20 Thread Deepankar Datta
http://ooonewsletter.blogspot.com/2005/10/opendoc-plug-in-for-ms- office-users.html ___ Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com ---

Re: [Marketing] It₼s hard to beat Office king

2005-10-20 Thread Chad Smith
On 10/18/05, Jonathon Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Still want to claim that OOo uses less resources? OOo uses a lot more resources - and it's slower. No questions there. It amazes me how open source promoters talk about MS Bloat, when MS Office is smaller, lighter, and faster than OOo. >

Re: [Marketing] CTO article

2005-10-20 Thread Charles-H.Schulz
Hello Ian, Although these things are hard to get (one of my friend who is totally foreign to FLOSS and OOo matters tells me to contact OEMs repeatedly :-) ) I'd like to mention two initiatives on the OEM that seem to work : -we have an OEM project: http://distribution.openoffice.org/oem/ -several n

Re: [Marketing] It₼s hard to beat Office ki ng

2005-10-20 Thread Tom Taylor
I've been a general user on systems for over 25 years. The only one that ever behaved as "it should" was the Mac. That's because it was intuitive. Moreover, you could buy, load, and use nearly every application without RTFM. Load and Go. There was an occasional reference to a "cheat sheet"