Re: [marketing] [Fwd: [releases] 3.2 New Features page]

2009-12-05 Thread Christine Louise Beems
I comprehend 'brain dead', John :-) Following is some alternative copy for your consideration, prefaced by explaining that only the text up to (my added) 'technical imrovements' heading has been revised... however the text following that (up to the ) was left in place verbatim to include a for

Re: [marketing] ODF desktop icons for OOo

2009-12-05 Thread Cor Nouws
Peter Junge wrote (1-12-2009 8:18) General remark: I didn't find the time to read the whole discussion here, so I might reiterate things that have already been said. Anyway I think this discussion is mostly happening at the wrong place. As we have often emphasized "OOo is not equal ODF". Conseq

[marketing] marketing discussion on ODF document icons - collection of comments

2009-12-05 Thread Bernhard Dippold
Hi all, I tried to collect thoughts and opinions about the ODF mime type icons inside the marketing project. It seems to me that most of the people interested in this topic already posted their opinion, so I think we should go back on disc...@ux.ooo to find a common agreement on the differen

Re: [marketing] ODF desktop icons for OOo (without OOo branding ATM) - volunteers?

2009-12-05 Thread Bernhard Dippold
Hi Drew, * Drew Jensen schrieb: Juergen Schmidt wrote: > [...] the key message of the icons is to strengthen the ODF brand. > And that application independent! For ODF it is important that > people understand the openness of the format, that it is based on > a standard and that it can be used w