Hi Louis,
Rather, the burden is on Microsoft. As the EU offices have pointed
out, there is already a standard and Microsoft should be creating
texts that work with that standard.
Right!
BTW, the full interview is here,
http://homepage.mac.com/luispo/blog/C564357417/E20060515190942/index.htm
Hi,
On 2006-05-17, at 10:07 , Kazunari Hirano wrote:
Hi,
http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB114727136610348924.html
quote: "We readily confess that there are occasional problems," he
says, adding that "these are much fewer in number with [the newest]
version."
-
We have to work hard f
Hi,
http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB114727136610348924.html
quote: "We readily confess that there are occasional problems," he
says, adding that "these are much fewer in number with [the newest]
version."
-
We have to work hard for 2.0.3 then. :)
Thanks,
khirano
-
Wall Street Journal no less ...
http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB114727136610348924.html
I also liked the quote: [OpenOffice.org] "opened and saved files more
quickly and didn't get hung up processing the way Office does from time to
time."
One to quote against the "OOo is too bloated / too
Hi,
On 2006-05-11, at 15:06 , John McCreesh wrote:
"I understand that Massachusetts is under the gun to migrate, and that
this might make it easier to fulfill their mandate," said Louis
Suarez-Potts, community manager for OpenOffice.org. But in general, he
added, "I see anything that extends th
"I understand that Massachusetts is under the gun to migrate, and that
this might make it easier to fulfill their mandate," said Louis
Suarez-Potts, community manager for OpenOffice.org. But in general, he
added, "I see anything that extends the life of Microsoft Office as
problematic."
http://www
