What could I do to help? Adam M.
On 4/13/05, Louis Suarez-Potts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Having reviewed the posts here, and believing we need to reanimate this > list, and full of youthful (not) enthusiasm, let's start again. > > Perhaps a goal could be also to involve the community. > > best, > Louis > > >Hi *, > > > >september passed, october passed, november passed, december passed... > > > >But still *no* visible evaluation of the RFEs occured. > > > >Still the RFEs are in a black hole. The only difference that now they > >are assigned to requirements, not to bh. > > > >Furthermore I somewhat lost confidence in the specification progress. > > > >developers' experience doesn't seem to be taken into account - it > > seems that they aren't even allowed to express their opinion. > > -> Very un-opensource. > > recent example: > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40210 > > > >still: lousy to fix RFEs are put into the queue and rot. > > > >short-sighted user scenarios. The community is not involved/asked for > >comments. Even when a user expresses concerns these are ignored. > >Changes to the spec are not possible, instead everything is moved to > OOo > >later and then we're on the black hole dilemma again. > > > >ciao > >Christian > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
