Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-01 Thread Edwin Punzalan
May I add, that when maven already downloaded a poor/invalid pom, even after fixing the pom in the repository, maven won't know that it's changed (unless the version changed) and it will not download it. So you end up still using your local repo copy. To re-download a pom, you have to delet

RE: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-01 Thread Mike Perham
> -Original Message- > From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2006 2:59 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us > > > > Perhaps we can have a rule that every dependency MUST have > a declared > > and

RE: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-01 Thread Kenney Westerhof
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Mike Perham wrote: > Maybe we need a much harsher line around the quality of accepted POMs. Maybe that's wise. > Perhaps we can have a rule that every dependency MUST have a declared > and element so that we know the developer has thought > about the correct values for t

m2: war plugin 2.0.1 [MWAR-38] not fully fixed

2006-07-01 Thread Ingo . Feulner
Hi all, unfortunately [MWAR-38] is not fully fixed - It still does not work in a multi-module build. We do have here the following structure: root jarmodule ejb webapp Running a "mvn package" inside the webapp module, the EJB-Client jar from the ejb module is resolved correctl

Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-01 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On 6/30/06, Mike Perham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "I'll spare you the details on that one" This does nothing to solve the problem. We can't fix what we don't know about... Sorry about that, if was meaning to write to the Maven list with more precise information later, my email was meant for