Le dimanche 22 avril 2007 01:35, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> The build is fine and the jar is produced correctly. It's the release
> plugin causing the problem.
>
> We'll sort it out.
great. I don't see how I can help on code for the moment: tell me if I can do
anything.
I'll work on documentation
On 22/04/07, Jeff Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:23 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [m1] review of plugins to release
>
> On 22/04/07, Jeff Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTE
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:23 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [m1] review of plugins to release
>
> On 22/04/07, Jeff Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Thus I have some doubts about so
On 22/04/07, Jeff Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus I have some doubts about some others plugins which have changes
> already applied [3] that could justify a new release :
I'm open to including none/some/all. If your concern is delaying the 1.1
release further, I understand the option
> Thus I have some doubts about some others plugins which have changes
> already applied [3] that could justify a new release :
I'm open to including none/some/all. If your concern is delaying the 1.1
release further, I understand the option to include "none". Are there any
that are "ready" and
On 21 Apr 07, at 5:30 PM 21 Apr 07, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Le samedi 21 avril 2007 22:09, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
I'll stage them again and you can test those:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant-
tasks-2.0.6/
If you find those to be all right then I'll call a vote a
+1
Vincent
2007/4/21, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Stephane Nicoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 10:49 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] release maven-source-plugin 2.0.3
Hi,
I'd like to release the maven-source-plu
Non binding : +1.
--
Olivier
-Message d'origine-
De : Jesse McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 20 avril 2007 21:28
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [Vote] release continuum 1.1 alpha 1
Its that time, to start releasing continuum in alpha to get some users and
feedback
Le samedi 21 avril 2007 22:09, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> I'll stage them again and you can test those:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant-
> tasks-2.0.6/
>
> If you find those to be all right then I'll call a vote again and
> we'll get them out.
No, there is a proble
Hi guys,
We have actually in the pipe the following plugins to release for maven
1.1 RC1 [1][2]:
- artifact 1.9
- changelog 1.9.2
- dist 1.7.1
- eclipse 1.11.1
- ejb 1.7.3
- linkcheck 1.4.1
- multiproject 1.5.1
- nsis 2.1
- test 1.8.1
- war 1.6.3
- xdoc 1.10.1
With the last snapshot
On 4/20/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...meaning leave the docs for the latest release exactly where they
are, and publish the snapshot docs somewhere else entirely.
New plan.
* Change nothing about the way 'mvn site-deploy' currently works-- it
will publish to, for example,
http
On 21 Apr 07, at 2:22 PM 21 Apr 07, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Le lundi 9 avril 2007 05:39, vous avez écrit :
-1
The uberjar does not work equivalently to the last release, as it
does not contain the lightweight http wagon. I've filed this as
MANTTASKS-64. I also noticed that the uberjar is larger
On 4/21/07, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, having the documentation not reflecting the released plugins but
SNAPSHOTs is not helpful to any user.
We're discussing this now in a different thread. Please add your
comments there if you have a preference.
http://www.nabbl
Hi guys, I posted this on the user list but got no answers. It is an urgent
matter as it is affecting some of our developers that are unable to build
the project anymore while others can. Talking about unreproducible builds.
We are getting the following stack-trace while executing the
assembly:di
Wayne Fay wrote:
>
> I wish I knew how to properly handle the issue of what I will call
> laziness wrt reading and using documentation on the part of users. It
> might be helpful to add a lot more things to the FAQ (including
> comments about web proxies with a link to the "configuring proxy" pa
Le lundi 9 avril 2007 05:39, vous avez écrit :
> -1
>
> The uberjar does not work equivalently to the last release, as it
> does not contain the lightweight http wagon. I've filed this as
> MANTTASKS-64. I also noticed that the uberjar is larger than the
> previous one, despite omitting some things
+1
-Original Message-
From: Stephane Nicoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 10:49 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] release maven-source-plugin 2.0.3
Hi,
I'd like to release the maven-source-plugin 2.0.3
The staging bits are available here:
http://peop
+1 with the mentioned license includes.
Christian.
Jesse McConnell wrote:
Its that time, to start releasing continuum in alpha to get some
users
and feedback on it.
The fixes are far too numerous to specify a concise list of,
hundred's
of jira's fixed and many new additions in functional
+1
Thanks for doing this :)
Niall
On 4/21/07, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release the maven-source-plugin 2.0.3
The staging bits are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~snicoll/maven-staging/repo/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-source-plugin/2.0.3/
The re
+1
Dan
On Friday 20 April 2007 22:49, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to release the maven-source-plugin 2.0.3
>
> The staging bits are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~snicoll/maven-staging/repo/org/apache/maven/
>plugins/maven-source-plugin/2.0.3/
>
> The release notes:
>
On 4/21/07, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to release the maven-source-plugin 2.0.3
+1 (Non-binding)
--
My cats know that I am a loser who goes out for hunting every day
without ever returning as much as a single mouse. Fortunately, I've
got a wife who's a real champ: Sh
On 4/21/07, Max Bowsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not necessarily. Maven plugins are maven-plugin,
but have extension .jar - the two do not have to be the same.
Hmmm, that's a good hint. Thank you!
Jochen
--
My cats know that I am a loser who goes out for hunting every day
without ever retu
On 4/21/07, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK but is there a way you defined the necessary hooks you need? Maybe
this could be reused for somebody else.
I have simply duplicated the war plugins properties and transfer the
values using
ReflectionUtils.getFieldByNameIncludingSupe
On 4/21/07, Barrie Treloar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The code out of svn for maven-invoker is broken:
Needs
org.apache.maven
maven-artifact
2.0.5
added
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For add
On 4/21/07, Barrie Treloar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the assembly plugin is using it, it looks like to stage the plugin for
it testing.
Is this plugin coming out of the sandbox at some stage and be documented?
I have no idea how to use it, etc.
The source for these snapshots was not deploye
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> I can change that to
>
>mywar
>
> but that means changing the extension.
Not necessarily. Maven plugins are maven-plugin,
but have extension .jar - the two do not have to be the same.
Max.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the assembly plugin is using it, it looks like to stage the plugin for
it testing.
Is this plugin coming out of the sandbox at some stage and be documented?
I have no idea how to use it, etc.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
27 matches
Mail list logo
