Re: finding maven.home in the invoker

2007-07-08 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Brian E. Fox wrote: I recently had some trouble with the invoker getting a good maven.home value from the mvn script. I came across this code in the eclipse tests that seems to work pretty well. Is there any objection to moving this code into the invoker in a fall back scenario? (ie if the

Wagon-webdav

2007-07-08 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hi, I recently fixed 2 bugs in wagon-webdav rc1-snapshot that make it possible to use it with maven 2.1 and 2.0.6/2.0.7. One bug was the addition of the omitted and required plexus-utils dependency - the code directly uses it. Since 2.0.6, plexus-utils is shaded and plugins and extensions are

RE: finding maven.home in the invoker

2007-07-08 Thread Brian E. Fox
I was confused when I first looked at the code also, but on XP at least it does work. (I stepped through it with the debugger). The details on the problems I found are in MNG-3085, but in short sometimes the variable is retrieved literally as ${env.M2_HOME} so it's not resolving correctly

Re: Wagon-webdav

2007-07-08 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On 7/8/07, Kenney Westerhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to see wheter it's feasible to release this wagon provider separately as rc1, or wheter we have to release the entire wagon stack. IMO, wagon-webdav is almosu unusable without proxy support. Which requires that WAGON-82 be fixed

Re: Wagon-webdav

2007-07-08 Thread Carlos Sanchez
On 7/8/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/8/07, Kenney Westerhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to see wheter it's feasible to release this wagon provider separately as rc1, or wheter we have to release the entire wagon stack. that will depend on what changes are in the

Re: Wagon-webdav

2007-07-08 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On 7/8/07, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that could be post 1.0 to mitigate risk Please have a look at the proposed changes before considering it a risk. Thanks, Jochen -- Besides, manipulating elections is under penalty of law, resulting in a preventative effect against

Re: Wagon-webdav

2007-07-08 Thread Carlos Sanchez
On 7/8/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/8/07, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that could be post 1.0 to mitigate risk Please have a look at the proposed changes before considering it a risk. I just meant that if it were a risk (as you said it changed the whole

Resource filtering thoughts...

2007-07-08 Thread Daniel Kulp
After battling with the braindead resource filtering once again for the ump-teenth time, I've decided I need to do something about it The main thing I'd like to do is allow use of a better filter engine (like velocity) that would provide much more flexibility. The issue is how to do

Re: [VOTE] release eclipse 2.4 (take 2)

2007-07-08 Thread Mark Hobson
Sorry to -1 after all the recent hard work fixing the tests, but they still break on Windows when run in a path with spaces - see MECLIPSE-291. Should be an easy fix, although I'm not sure if I'll get a chance to take a proper look immediately. Cheers, Mark On 08/07/07, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL

RE: [VOTE] release eclipse 2.4 (take 2)

2007-07-08 Thread Brian E. Fox
The problem is in the invoker. When the pom is specified as is in the case of the plugin tools, the -F command line is used to specify it: if ( !pom.xml.equals( pom.getName() ) ) { logger .debug( Specified POM file is not named

[VOTE] release maven-plugin-testing-harness 1.1

2007-07-08 Thread Brian E. Fox
There have been tons of enhancements to the plugin testing harness since the last release in April. Several plugins require the new version before release. Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/tags/maven-plugin-testing- harness-1.1 Staged at:

Re: [VOTE] release eclipse 2.4 (take 2)

2007-07-08 Thread Dan Tran
+1 to release 2.4, tested with several projects mine. -D On 7/8/07, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem is in the invoker. When the pom is specified as is in the case of the plugin tools, the -F command line is used to specify it: if ( !pom.xml.equals( pom.getName()

[Vote] release maven-enforcer-plugin 1.0-alpha-3 and maven-enforcer-rule-api 1.0-alpha-2

2007-07-08 Thread Brian E. Fox
Last release vote this weekend, I promise ;-) The rule api is used by the plugin and is included with this vote. The only change was to the pom to remove an unnecessary dependency. This release contains a few small fixes and several new enforcer rules. The site has been updated with info

RE: [vote] Release Maven Shared JAR component 1.0

2007-07-08 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1 -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 5:18 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [vote] Release Maven Shared JAR component 1.0 This component is used in the project-info-reports plugin (and is a prereq to its next release)

RE: [VOTE] Graduate maven-patch-plugin from sandbox and release version 1.0

2007-07-08 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1 Typo in the site url, correct url is: http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/stage/sites/maven-patch-plugin Also, I noticed the faq seems malformed with 2 lists of questions instead of 1 list with 2 questions. Otherwise looks interesting. -Original Message- From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] release maven-plugin-testing-harness 1.1

2007-07-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 On 8 Jul 07, at 4:37 PM 8 Jul 07, Brian E. Fox wrote: There have been tons of enhancements to the plugin testing harness since the last release in April. Several plugins require the new version before release. Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/tags/maven-plugin-

Re: [Vote] release maven-enforcer-plugin 1.0-alpha-3 and maven-enforcer-rule-api 1.0-alpha-2

2007-07-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 On 8 Jul 07, at 4:56 PM 8 Jul 07, Brian E. Fox wrote: Last release vote this weekend, I promise ;-) The rule api is used by the plugin and is included with this vote. The only change was to the pom to remove an unnecessary dependency. This release contains a few small fixes and

Re: [Vote] release maven-enforcer-plugin 1.0-alpha-3 and maven-enforcer-rule-api 1.0-alpha-2

2007-07-08 Thread Jason Dillon
+1 --jason On Jul 8, 2007, at 4:56 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote: Last release vote this weekend, I promise ;-) The rule api is used by the plugin and is included with this vote. The only change was to the pom to remove an unnecessary dependency. This release contains a few small fixes and