Should we be hardcoding the width and height of the PoweredBy logo? What
if someone wants to use a differently sized logo? It would then be
shrinked or expanded, resulting in a possibly distorted image.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ltheussl
Date: Fri Nov 16 00:49:16 2007
New Revision:
Hardcoding is certainly not ideal. Maybe I'm mixing something up here
but in m1 I remember the problem that oversized logos messed up the
whole page formatting. I haven't checked this here, but if a user has to
supply properly sized logos anyway, then it doesn't matter. It should at
least be
Hi,
This build looks to require some external setup [1] to build with continuum.
I will try to fix this.
--
Olivier
[1]
http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/surefireReport.action?buildId=35468projectId=57#org.apache.maven.shared.invoker.DefaultInvokerTest
7/11/18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
See my post to this list on October 28. titled Problems with
plugin-parent-10.
Where do we want it documented?
I can write something up.
Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
Why ?
is it documented somewhere ?
On Nov 15, 2007 4:51 PM, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need to add an scm
Ok, I didn't see this thread.
2 things :
1) Is it already fixed in the release plugin ?
2) If it's not fixed, can't we release manually a version 11 of the
plugin-parent pom ?
Arnaud
On Nov 18, 2007 7:12 PM, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See my post to this list on October 28.
Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
Ok, I didn't see this thread.
It seems that nobody did :-(
2 things :
1) Is it already fixed in the release plugin ?
I don't even know if it is a bug in the release plugin
2) If it's not fixed, can't we release manually a version 11 of the
plugin-parent pom ?
We
Copy-and-paste error in the site.xml:
bannerLeft shouldn't reference maven-jxr-plugin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: vsiveton
Date: Fri Nov 16 06:10:20 2007
New Revision: 595668
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=595668view=rev
Log:
o added documentation
Added:
