I want to see maven-plugin-plugin release before releasing
maven-plugins-parent. We did several major changes since the last
release (around 1 year) and only one issue is left.
Then please schedule MPLUGIN-73 for this release, too.
Benjamin Bentmann
--
Hi Dennis,
2008/2/16, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all
>
> I'm going to release maven-parent-8 and when that is done
> maven-plugins-11 (also a parent). Is there something more that should be
> included before I go ahead with the releases?
>
>
> Changelogs
>
> maven-parent:
> https://
Seems to be a bug in the metadata handling. I went through this process:
- ensured nothing from cargo-maven2-plugin was in the my local
repository or archiva repository
- try building struts apps
- get failure that it can't find RELEASE.
- checked metadata returned from Archiva - it contains n
Brian,
Can you put the maven-ant-task-2.0.8-sources in the right location too?
Thanks,
Paul
On Feb 6, 2008 11:42 AM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok it's in the right place now.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Paul B
Hi all
I'm going to release maven-parent-8 and when that is done
maven-plugins-11 (also a parent). Is there something more that should be
included before I go ahead with the releases?
Changelogs
maven-parent:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml?r1=628267&r2=587312&di
+1
Fabrice
On Feb 16, 2008 12:51 AM, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As you might expect, all the good bugs were found in 2.4.1 [looks like
> some folks were waiting for SP1 to start testing... ;-)]
>
> We solved 5 issues:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId
Profile defined in a profiles.xml cannot contain any plugins. So i don't see
how i could use this to invoke plugins (plugin executions) defined in the
corporate pom.
Kind Regards,
Wouter Hermeling
Brian E Fox wrote:
>
> I was told today that profiles defined in the profiles.xml are inherited
>
2008/2/16, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yep. I think lots of users are corrupting their binary files at first.
>
> Do you also think that we should exclude well known format by default
> (png,jpg,jpeg,bmp,etc)?
Yep, this will be easier and transparent for users.
>
> Thanks,
> Stéphane
>
Yep. I think lots of users are corrupting their binary files at first.
Do you also think that we should exclude well known format by default
(png,jpg,jpeg,bmp,etc)?
Thanks,
Stéphane
On Feb 16, 2008 10:28 AM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Here it's a global option at the mojo le
Hi,
Here it's a global option at the mojo level to disable filtering on
user defined file extensions.
IMHO, it's more easy for a user to not have declare twice a resource
(in the war plugin : webResource or an overlay) directory :
- one with filtering enabled (with some includes/excludes to exclude
10 matches
Mail list logo