Yes, it has been removed as there is no more requirement for application
code to lookup for dependencies from either PlexusFactory or SpringFactory.
All the spring-support related code has move to plexus-spring project (at
branch root).
plexus-spring will inject components/beans created in a
thanks, Brett allready reported this but I definitly have troubles with the
world instantiation ;-)
2008/3/1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Author: rinku
Date: Fri Feb 29 15:26:27 2008
New Revision: 632495
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=632495view=rev
Log:
o fixed minor
That's what I supposed but just want to verify.
2008/3/1, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It may not be necessary - presumably webwork's built in spring object
factory that you are now using does this already.
On 01/03/2008, at 8:11 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
Thanks for the link, I'll
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 7:51 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/12/2007, at 1:35 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
I was just going to leave it under continuum/trunk as continuum-docs
and continuum-site.
Cool, thanks for that. Should be pretty straightforward to move the
site up
On the Maven zone, I changed the schedule for the Continuum Parent
group to 'On Demand' so that it won't run.
AFAIK there's no way to tell it where the source code moved, so we'll
have to delete and re-add the projects.
(Talking about using Continuuum to build Continuum is confusing...)
--
I was due to move it to vmbuild anyway so I'll just do that now.
Sorry about that, should have remembered.
- Brett
On 02/03/2008, at 3:12 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On the Maven zone, I changed the schedule for the Continuum Parent
group to 'On Demand' so that it won't run.
AFAIK there's no way
Jason,
Have you found some time to look ?
I have created a resources plugin branch [1] which use the new component.
Thanks,
--
Olivier
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/branches/MRESOURCES-56/
2008/2/28, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You just have to make sure that the
I will be out of the office starting 25.02.2008 and will not return until
03.03.2008.
I will respond to your message when I return.
I'm so glad to know that. Can we block these messages?
-Original Message-
From: Julia Antonova [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 8:55 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out due to sick leave.
I will be out of the office starting
I'll write something up about the ordering of processing in the wiki
so that we don't lose it in the ether. Probably won't happen today but
later Sunday night.
On 1-Mar-08, at 5:52 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Jason,
Have you found some time to look ?
I have created a resources plugin branch
I'm sorry.
I've uploaded the gpg signatures and will call a vote on the artifact..
Milos
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some reason you're not using the release plugin for this?
Also, it looks like 1.0 was put into rsync'd repository, but I
Hi,
Please vote on the maven-toolchain 1.0 artifact.
The background for the release:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/200802.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Toolchains
Unfortately I've messed up and released the bits already. As
instructed by Wendy
+1 from me.
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Milos Kleint [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Please vote on the maven-toolchain 1.0 artifact.
The background for the release:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/200802.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Milos Kleint [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Please vote on the maven-toolchain 1.0 artifact.
The background for the release:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/200802.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Toolchains
Actually, now I'm confused... looking at commits it's being re-
integrated into the trunk and branches (Which seems like a good thing
to me).
Is this release needed any more Milos? Should we just pull it out?
- Brett
On 02/03/2008, at 10:17 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
It's a bit tricky. I
On 1-Mar-08, at 3:22 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Actually, now I'm confused... looking at commits it's being re-
integrated into the trunk and branches (Which seems like a good
thing to me).
Is this release needed any more Milos? Should we just pull it out?
We should practice what we
On Saturday 01 March 2008, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 1-Mar-08, at 3:22 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Actually, now I'm confused... looking at commits it's being re-
integrated into the trunk and branches (Which seems like a good
thing to me).
Is this release needed any more Milos? Should we
On 02/03/2008, at 11:00 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 1-Mar-08, at 3:22 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Actually, now I'm confused... looking at commits it's being re-
integrated into the trunk and branches (Which seems like a good
thing to me).
Is this release needed any more Milos? Should we
On 02/03/2008, at 11:07 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
We should practice what we preach, in that no one else can retract
mistakes and it should stay and Milos release it again. I just told
someone on the repo-maintainers list they couldn't change or pull
mistakes.
Change, no - but surely we
On 1-Mar-08, at 4:07 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 02/03/2008, at 11:00 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 1-Mar-08, at 3:22 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Actually, now I'm confused... looking at commits it's being re-
integrated into the trunk and branches (Which seems like a good
thing to me).
Is
On 1-Mar-08, at 4:10 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 02/03/2008, at 11:07 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
We should practice what we preach, in that no one else can retract
mistakes and it should stay and Milos release it again. I just
told someone on the repo-maintainers list they couldn't change
Hi,
The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the 2.0.9
release as well.
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540styleName=Htmlversion=13994
The remaining issues in JIRA are feature requests.
Staging repo:
+1
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the 2.0.9
release as well.
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540styleName=Htmlversion=13994
The
+1
--jason
On Mar 2, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the
2.0.9 release as well.
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540styleName=Htmlversion=13994
The remaining issues
+1
I was sure I was going to have to give a -1 because MSHADE-9 was marked
Not reproducible, but I too can't reproduce it using this version; I
think/hope that this is because we upgraded our version of asm and that
took care of it. :-)
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
The Shade plugin is ready
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, now I'm confused... looking at commits it's being re-
integrated into the trunk and branches (Which seems like a good thing
to me).
Is this release needed any more Milos? Should we just pull it out?
Yes, this
26 matches
Mail list logo
