Re: [RC] Moving forward with 2.0.10

Sure, I was just suggesting that things that used to work and now don't, like this, are more important :) On 29/10/2008, at 2:04 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: ok brett, I'll try to create a testcase without seam. Even if we try to improve the quality of our releases I think we have to fix an

Re: [RC] Moving forward with 2.0.10

ok brett, I'll try to create a testcase without seam. Even if we try to improve the quality of our releases I think we have to fix any issue that we find in 2.0.x in a bug fix and not only bugs we introduced in a bug fix release. >From the beginning we should have apply only bugs fixes on 2.0.x

overriding via a profile

Hi, If a plugin is defined in the normal build section of a pom and has defined a specific execution, is it possible to override this execution by defining the same plugin in a profile? The plugin I am working on, uses a forked build lifecycle, so when I try to do this, I see the executio

Re: [RC] Moving forward with 2.0.10

Hi Arnaud, The issue didn't make it clear that this is actually a regression from 2.0.8 -> 2.0.9. It'd be helpful to have an IT for this that doesn't rely on Seam to be able to get it fixed. I'd be a little reluctant to make a dep change this far along in 2.0.10, since it's not a regressi

Re: [RC] Moving forward with 2.0.10

MNG-3775 is also more than annoying We added a testcase and I can try to create an IT if necessary. Arnaud On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Benjamin Bentmann < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brian E. Fox wrote: > > Please try it out and see if we have an

Re: [RC] Moving forward with 2.0.10

I seem to remember a fix brett put in for this when we were working on [what became] 2.1.0-M1. I think it's in a console resolution listener, possibly in maven-core or maven-artifact (-manager). I'm pretty sure this is in maven, not wagon. Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Brian E. Fox wrote: Please

RE: [RC] Moving forward with 2.0.10

In the new wagon beta-3 I imagine. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 4:38 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [RC] Moving forward with 2.0.10 Brian E. Fox wrote: > Please try it out and see if we have any remaining

Re: [RC] Moving forward with 2.0.10

Brian E. Fox wrote: Please try it out and see if we have any remaining regressions over 2.0.9. If it looks good, then I'll recut the official build as normal. Hm, the RC prints ugly exception stack traces of org.apache.maven.wagon.ResourceDoesNotExistException, even on INFO level. Just try "

Archetypes : review needed.

Hi folks, I have started to add some new versons of the our old archetypes. Please feel free to review/change the archetypes at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/archetype/trunk/archetype-samples/ Thanks in advance for any review. Regards, Raphaël

Re: [RC] Moving forward with 2.0.10

Brian E. Fox wrote: Please try it out and see if we have any remaining regressions over 2.0.9. It's not a regression but would nicely fit our efforts to stabilize things: While investigating why 2.0.10-RC1 passed the IT MNG-3599 for Brett but not for me, I discovered MNG-3805. It's just anot

Re: [RC] Moving forward with 2.0.10

I was hoping this would be a quick process and not require another branch, but if we need to then lets make a branch On 10/28/08 5:55 AM, "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for picking this up Brian, got sick over the weekend and didn't > have the time to poke at this further to

Re: [RC] Moving forward with 2.0.10

Thanks for picking this up Brian, got sick over the weekend and didn't have the time to poke at this further to where I was. I fixed the build up after the release now, will try the binaries out over the next day or two. For the purpose of committing any fixes, will you be creating an RC

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Release plugin version 2.0-beta-8

+1 Emmanuel On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to release Maven Release plugin version 2.0-beta-8. (last > release is one year old). > > We solved 27 issues : > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13812&styleName=Html&p