+1
Emmanuel
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nuwrote:
It's been a long time since a clean release:
Staged site:
http://people.apache.org/~brianf/maven-clean-plugin/index.htmlhttp://people.apache.org/%7Ebrianf/maven-clean-plugin/index.html
Staged
+1
--
Olivier
2009/1/7 Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nu:
It's been a long time since a clean release:
Staged site:
http://people.apache.org/~brianf/maven-clean-plugin/index.html
Staged repo:
http://people.apache.org/~brianf/staging-repository/
Issues fixed:
Dear all,
There was a discussion about version ranges management a few weeks ago
on the ML.
I think that the following document from Eclipse p2 could be of interest:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox/p2/Proposals/Version_Type_Proposal
Daniel
--
Daniel Le Berre
I was talking about this with Brian a few days ago when I saw this
pass by the p2 list.
At least in the case of Maven and Eclipse going forward in the future
I don't see any downside to just using the same versioning scheme as
OSGi. If it makes things easier for interoperability then I'm
Jason van Zyl a écrit :
I was talking about this with Brian a few days ago when I saw this pass
by the p2 list.
At least in the case of Maven and Eclipse going forward in the future I
don't see any downside to just using the same versioning scheme as OSGi.
If it makes things easier for
Another smallish release that's been waiting a while. I'm going to work
with Oleg next week to have the dependency plugin use mercury so I'd
like to get the current fixes out in a stable form first.
Release Notes:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14007styleName
Hi Juan,
I just deployed 1.1-SNAPSHOT artifacts.
Cheers,
Vincent
2009/1/6, Juan F. Codagnone juan-o...@zauber.com.ar:
Hi Vincent,
I also think the 1.1-SNAPSHOT could be deployed on
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/. 1.0-beta-1-SNAPSHOT is
the only version available
On 7-Jan-09, at 10:10 AM, Daniel Le Berre wrote:
Jason van Zyl a écrit :
I was talking about this with Brian a few days ago when I saw this
pass
by the p2 list.
At least in the case of Maven and Eclipse going forward in the
future I
don't see any downside to just using the same
+1
On 7-Jan-09, at 10:43 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Another smallish release that's been waiting a while. I'm going to
work
with Oleg next week to have the dependency plugin use mercury so I'd
like to get the current fixes out in a stable form first.
Release Notes:
+1
Arnaud
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Jason van Zyl jvan...@sonatype.com wrote:
+1
On 7-Jan-09, at 10:43 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Another smallish release that's been waiting a while. I'm going to work
with Oleg next week to have the dependency plugin use mercury so I'd
like to get
Hi,
We solved 1 issue, to comply with the board resolution about Privacy
policy page.
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11430styleName=Htmlversion=14872
There are no issue left in JIRA.
Staging repo:
http://people.apache.org/~vsiveton/staging-repo/
Staging site (need
+1
--
Olivier
2009/1/7 Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com:
Hi,
We solved 1 issue, to comply with the board resolution about Privacy
policy page.
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11430styleName=Htmlversion=14872
There are no issue left in JIRA.
Staging
Jason van Zyl a écrit :
On 7-Jan-09, at 10:10 AM, Daniel Le Berre wrote:
Jason van Zyl a écrit :
I was talking about this with Brian a few days ago when I saw this pass
by the p2 list.
At least in the case of Maven and Eclipse going forward in the future I
don't see any downside to
+1
Brian E. Fox wrote:
It's been a long time since a clean release:
Staged site:
http://people.apache.org/~brianf/maven-clean-plugin/index.html
Staged repo:
http://people.apache.org/~brianf/staging-repository/
Issues fixed:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Siveton [mailto:vincent.sive...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 11:06 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Maven Stylus Skin version 1.1
Hi,
We solved 1 issue, to comply with the board resolution about Privacy
policy
replied in issue comments.
Jason van Zyl wrote:
John,
Is this something we added a long time ago for profile activation?
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
Hi Brian,
2009/1/6 Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nu:
It's been a long time since a clean release:
Staged site:
http://people.apache.org/~brianf/maven-clean-plugin/index.html
-1 since we need to have a link to privacy policy page using the Maven
Stylus Skin.
Staged repo:
Hi Brian,
2009/1/7, Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nu:
Another smallish release that's been waiting a while. I'm going to work
with Oleg next week to have the dependency plugin use mercury so I'd
like to get the current fixes out in a stable form first.
Release Notes:
+1
Arnaud
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nuwrote:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Siveton [mailto:vincent.sive...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 11:06 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Maven Stylus Skin
+1
- Fabrice
belling...@apache.org
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Vincent Siveton
vincent.sive...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
We solved 1 issue, to comply with the board resolution about Privacy
policy page.
On 7-Jan-09, at 11:32 AM, Daniel Le Berre wrote:
Jason van Zyl a écrit :
On 7-Jan-09, at 10:10 AM, Daniel Le Berre wrote:
Jason van Zyl a écrit :
I was talking about this with Brian a few days ago when I saw
this pass
by the p2 list.
At least in the case of Maven and Eclipse going
I'll redeploy the site then once the stylus skin gets released. This
shouldn't affect the actual binaries so no need to respin the release.
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Siveton [mailto:vincent.sive...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 11:45 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Actually the stylus skin below doesn't have the privacy policy, which is
weird cause it's working for m.a.o
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Siveton [mailto:vincent.sive...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 11:06 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Maven
That's because
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/skins/trunk/maven-stylus-skin/src/site/site.xml
is still using the 1.0.1 version of the skin. It should be using 1.1.
I don't know if it's possible to change the version of the skin in
site.xml to the version-to-be-released prior to the
Hi,
We need to make a release with no snapshot, and I don't think we can
do what's you propose.
It is an chicken and egg issue... similar to with the maven-plugin-plugin [1].
I think we could live with it.
Cheers,
Vincent
[1]
Is it really a chicken and egg issue?
I think it depends on what is done during the release process. If the
release process consists of packaging a jar and deploying it to a repo.
Will the version number in the site.xml file be resolved? Or will it be
resolved when the site of the artifact is
Similar to the clean plugin vote thread, we need to have a link to
privacy policy page using the Maven Stylus Skin.
Site and tag updated:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin-2.1/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
-1 since we need to have a link to privacy policy page using the Maven
Stylus Skin.
Site is restaged and tag is updated:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-clean-plugin-2.3/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
28 matches
Mail list logo
