Nice idea, I'll not be available at this time but will listen the records
with attention.
Cheers,
Nicolas
2009/6/2 Ralph Goers
> The time is fine and I'm definitely looking forward to doing this. I assume
> this is open to anyone who is interested. Please follow up with the
> conference call inf
The time is fine and I'm definitely looking forward to doing this. I
assume this is open to anyone who is interested. Please follow up with
the conference call info as soon as it is available.
Ralph
On Jun 1, 2009, at 2:01 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
What works well for team updates (in
sounds good, it's on my calendar now.
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
What works well for team updates (in addition to the wiki and email) at
Eclipse are weekly calls and I am going to start holding one each week.
Those who want to participate can, and the call will be recorded so
people can listen
On Jun 1, 2009, at 1:47 PM, Paul Gier wrote:
When the source plugin forks the lifecycle it causes all the phases
up to "generate-sources" to be run again. So if your assembly
plugin is bound to any phase before that it will be run twice. Once
in the main lifecycle and once in the forked
2009/5/29 David Jencks
> I'm eager to see this get out... this version works fine for me after I
> hacked the assembly descriptor parents so I could build it (no idea why I
> couldn't get to the parent snapshots)
>
> I'm not convinced all the worrying about regular expressions for
> includes/excl
Hi,
I'm not sure to be able to be here (I'm always at work at this time) but
it's a good initiative.
I suppose you'll post info to join the call here ?
Thx
Arnaud
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What works well for team updates (in addition to the wiki and
+1 I think this is a fine idea
looking forward to it
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 16:01, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What works well for team updates (in addition to the wiki and email) at
> Eclipse are weekly calls and I am going to start hold
Hi,
What works well for team updates (in addition to the wiki and email)
at Eclipse are weekly calls and I am going to start holding one each
week. Those who want to participate can, and the call will be recorded
so people can listen at their leisure and follow up with questions on
the ma
When the source plugin forks the lifecycle it causes all the phases up to
"generate-sources" to be run again. So if your assembly plugin is bound to any
phase before that it will be run twice. Once in the main lifecycle and once in
the forked lifecycle. Since your assembly goal is bound to th
I guess my description wasn't quite precise enough to get people to
look at the snippet. The snippet I showed has this bit twice:
[INFO] [assembly:single {execution: default}]
[INFO] Building tar : /Users/david/geronimo/svn/geronimo/genesis/
trunk/target/genesis-2.0-SNAPSHOT-source-release.t
John Casey wrote:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-004
+1
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Resending this with the proper subject...*SIGH*
Hi again,
I've corrected the missing NOTICE and LICENSE files, and [hopefully] the
POM signature issue (by using Maven 2.0.10 for the release...2.2.0 isn't
released yet, so I don't want to inject further risk of bugs).
Please let me know if I'v
Hi again,
I've corrected the missing NOTICE and LICENSE files, and [hopefully] the
POM signature issue (by using Maven 2.0.10 for the release...2.2.0 isn't
released yet, so I don't want to inject further risk of bugs).
Please let me know if I've missed anything else.
URLs below have been upd
A new goal "jar-no-fork" was added to the source plugin in MSOURCES-13. If you
update to version 2.1 of the source plugin and change the goal "jar" to
"jar-no-fork" that might work better for you.
David Jencks wrote:
I thought it was working great but...
what could cause this?
[INFO]
-
Ben, you're right...that was a stupid move on my part, forgetting about
a bug that I spent quite a lot of time fixing! :-)
I'll also correct that one-off source-release assembly for the assembly
plugin itself, and reissue the release for a new vote.
-john
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
John Casey
If you're talking about the [source:jar] bit, then that's another plugin
(maven-sources-plugin, IIRC) that may need to be turned off...though
that does produce a different type of artifact than the project source
structure we're attempting to put together for source releases.
-john
David Jenc
16 matches
Mail list logo
