maven-archetype-2.0-alpha-5 tag

2009-11-12 Thread Stevo Slavić
Hello Maven developers, I'd like just to inform you that while checking out maven archetype I've noticed that there is a maven-archetype-2.0-alpha-5 tag created in April 2009; most recent release is 2.0-alpha-4 from September 2008, and current trunk is 2.0-alpha-5-SNAPSHOT, so this existing

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven reporting impl version 2.0.4.3

2009-11-12 Thread Mark Hobson
2009/11/10 Vincent Siveton vsive...@apache.org: The vote has passed with the following result : +1 Benjamin, Lukas, Dennis, Hervé, Vincent I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. Have the artifacts been promoted to central? I can't see them:

Re: maven-archetype-2.0-alpha-5 tag

2009-11-12 Thread Brett Porter
Nice catch, I've removed it. On 12/11/2009, at 7:22 PM, Stevo Slavić wrote: Hello Maven developers, I'd like just to inform you that while checking out maven archetype I've noticed that there is a maven-archetype-2.0-alpha-5 tag created in April 2009; most recent release is 2.0-alpha-4

Re: maven-archetype-2.0-alpha-5 tag

2009-11-12 Thread Stevo Slavić
Great! Debugged 2.0-alpha-4, and I think I've solved ARCHETYPE-220http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ARCHETYPE-220issue. Can someone with enough privileges please flag the issue that it contains a patch (no additional tests, yet), and if agreed to increase issue priority from Minor to Major as IMO

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven reporting impl version 2.0.4.3

2009-11-12 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi Mark, It seems that we changed the groupid/artifactid in the past. Here the right link: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/reporting/maven-reporting-impl/ Cheers, Vincent 2009/11/12 Mark Hobson markhob...@gmail.com: 2009/11/10 Vincent Siveton vsive...@apache.org: The vote has

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Brett Porter
+1 I downloaded the source tarball and verified the signature matches KEYS. I built from source, then rebuilt the source with itself without error on a clean repository. I'll do some more testing, but that's sufficient for an alpha release. Nice work! Cheers, Brett On 10/11/2009, at 3:39 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Vincent Siveton
+1 Vincent 2009/11/9 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu: Hi, OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys that want to take it for a test drive ;-) We solved many issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=14719

integration test versioning policy?

2009-11-12 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, I ran the ITs against 3.0-alpha-3 and got a number of failures. Several of those are because they are fixed in 3.0-alpha-4 but marked to run for all versions: - mng4412OfflineModeInPlugin - mng4433ForceParentSnapshotUpdate Before correcting anything I would like to check I understand the

Re: IT failure (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3)

2009-11-12 Thread Brian Fox
That sounds like the one that is supposed to be fixed in alpha-4 On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote: Doesn't affect my vote, but I noted that this IT fails on 3.0-alpha-3, even though it is marked as fixed in JIRA: - mng4361ForceDependencySnapshotUpdate

Re: integration test versioning policy?

2009-11-12 Thread Brian Fox
There should be a start and end range for the tests. These new ones start in alpha-4-snapshot and end ] On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I ran the ITs against 3.0-alpha-3 and got a number of failures. Several of those are because they are fixed in

Re: Use-case for multiple plugin entries in the same plugins section

2009-11-12 Thread Brian Fox
You should use the inherited element of the execution for that. On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Just thought of a use-case for listing the same plugin twice in the one plugins section namely inheritedtrue/inherited and

Re: integration test versioning policy?

2009-11-12 Thread Brett Porter
On 13/11/2009, at 1:08 AM, Brian Fox wrote: There should be a start and end range for the tests. These new ones start in alpha-4-snapshot and end ] ok, I've fixed these 2 and 4361 based on your other comment (though I haven't changed the JIRA version of that issue). I also included all

Re: Use-case for multiple plugin entries in the same plugins section

2009-11-12 Thread Stephen Connolly
but what if you want to configure the defaults for all executions, and for the child module executions, and you want the defaults for the child modules to be different from the defaults for this module. e.g. turn skip on for this module, but off for child modules 2009/11/12 Brian Fox

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread John Casey
+1, seems to run well here. Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys that want to take it for a test drive ;-) We solved many issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=14719 There are

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven reporting impl version 2.0.4.3

2009-11-12 Thread Mark Hobson
Ah great, thanks :) Mark 2009/11/12 Vincent Siveton vsive...@apache.org: Hi Mark, It seems that we changed the groupid/artifactid in the past. Here the right link: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/reporting/maven-reporting-impl/ Cheers, Vincent 2009/11/12 Mark Hobson

Re : Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Julien HENRY
Another issue I have with Maven 3: trying to deploy an artifact with release:perform, I get the following error: [INFO] [ERROR] Error deploying artifact: Unsupported Protocol: 'dav': Cannot find wagon which supports the requested protocol: dav - [Help 1] [INFO] [ERROR] Is it a known issue?

Re: Checkstyle ready for a 2.4 release?

2009-11-12 Thread Mark Hobson
I've upgraded maven-reporting-impl now that it has been released. The only unresolved issue destined for 2.4 is now MCHECKSTYLE-123 [1]. Can this be resolved quickly or shall we defer it until 2.5? Cheers, Mark [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-123 2009/11/4 Mark Hobson

Re: Re : Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Olivier Lamy
wagon weddav is not any more included in the distrib. You have to add it in your pom. -- Olivier 2009/11/12 Julien HENRY henr...@yahoo.fr: Another issue I have with Maven 3: trying to deploy an artifact with release:perform, I get the following error: [INFO] [ERROR] Error deploying

Re: Checkstyle ready for a 2.4 release?

2009-11-12 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, Move it to 2.5. I wanted to work on some refactoring on the plugin. But the best is to do it after the release :-) -- Olivier 2009/11/12 Mark Hobson markhob...@gmail.com: I've upgraded maven-reporting-impl now that it has been released. The only unresolved issue destined for 2.4 is now

Re : Re : Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Julien HENRY
OK, thanks - Message d'origine De : Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org À : Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org Envoyé le : Jeu 12 Novembre 2009, 16 h 58 min 00 s Objet : Re: Re : Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3 wagon weddav is not any more included in the distrib.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Hervé Le lundi 09 novembre 2009, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : Hi, OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys that want to take it for a test drive ;-) We solved many issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=14 719

Re: Checkstyle ready for a 2.4 release?

2009-11-12 Thread Mark Hobson
Great, thanks Olivier. I'll start the vote for 2.4. Cheers, Mark 2009/11/12 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: Hi, Move it to 2.5. I wanted to work on some refactoring on the plugin. But the best is to do it after the release :-) -- Olivier 2009/11/12 Mark Hobson markhob...@gmail.com:

[VOTE] Release Maven Checkstyle plugin version 2.4

2009-11-12 Thread Mark Hobson
Hi, The big new feature in this release is an upgrade to Checkstyle 5.0, which brings Java 5 compatibility. We solved 6 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11127version=15336 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: endorsing: ToolChain thing or compiler/surefire plugin thing or ....

2009-11-12 Thread Daniel Kulp
Just to follow up on this, it looks like the two main options are: 1) Add an endorsed scope. What would be involved with that? What would happen when a 2.0.10/2.2.1 maven version hits such a scope?This seems to be a maven core thing with updates needed to a bunch of core things. Not

Re: endorsing: ToolChain thing or compiler/surefire plugin thing or ....

2009-11-12 Thread Paul Benedict
Is it possible to add endorsed libraries programatically? I thought the JDK grabbed all its endorsements from jdk_home\lib\ext Paul On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: Just to follow up on this, it looks like the two main options are: 1) Add an endorsed

Re: endorsing: ToolChain thing or compiler/surefire plugin thing or ....

2009-11-12 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Thu November 12 2009 2:22:51 pm Paul Benedict wrote: Is it possible to add endorsed libraries programatically? I thought the JDK grabbed all its endorsements from jdk_home\lib\ext When you fork a jvm (javac fork or surefire set to fork), you can specify a system property of other places to

Re: endorsing: ToolChain thing or compiler/surefire plugin thing or ....

2009-11-12 Thread Paul Benedict
Yes, then it is probably appropriate for the Maven Compiler plugin to support endorsed libraries. I can't remember if it always forks, but if forking isn't specified, an error should be thrown when endorsed libraries are used. Paul On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org

[ANN] Apache Source-Release Assembly Descriptor 1.0.2 Released

2009-11-12 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Source-Release Assembly Descriptor, version 1.0.2. This is a standardized assembly descriptor for use in the maven-assembly-plugin. Source-release artifacts are archives which contain the full project structure (sources only, no build

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Arnaud Héritier, Olivier Lamy, Jason van Zyl, Stéphane Nicoll, Dan Fabulich, Brian Fox, Brett Porter, Vincent Siveton, John Casey, Hervé Boutemy +1 (non-binding): Stephen Connolly, Stuart McCulloch, Paul

Site Update for Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, I noticed that we didn't mention previous alphas of 3.0 on the Maven site. How do we want to go about that with alpha-3? To attract more testers, I think we should have this alpha listed in the download section. E.g. some structure like * Stable Releases 2.2.1 2.1.0 2.0.10 *

Re: Site Update for Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Jason van Zyl
Can't hurt. I have no problem promoting alpha-3. It's the best Maven that's existed. I say go for it. On 2009-11-13, at 12:59 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, I noticed that we didn't mention previous alphas of 3.0 on the Maven site. How do we want to go about that with alpha-3? To

Re: Site Update for Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Brett Porter
On 13/11/2009, at 10:59 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, I noticed that we didn't mention previous alphas of 3.0 on the Maven site. How do we want to go about that with alpha-3? To attract more testers, I think we should have this alpha listed in the download section. E.g. some

[jira] Subscription: Design Best Practices

2009-11-12 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Design Best Practices (28 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184 MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques

Re: Site Update for Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Brett Porter
On 13/11/2009, at 11:28 AM, Brett Porter wrote: On 13/11/2009, at 10:59 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, I noticed that we didn't mention previous alphas of 3.0 on the Maven site. How do we want to go about that with alpha-3? To attract more testers, I think we should have this

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Checkstyle plugin version 2.4

2009-11-12 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 2009/11/12 Mark Hobson markhob...@gmail.com Hi, The big new feature in this release is an upgrade to Checkstyle 5.0, which brings Java 5 compatibility. We solved 6 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11127version=15336 There are still a couple of

Re: Site Update for Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Stevo Slavić
IMO 2.1.0 should stay as it is, if I'm not mistaken, most recent stable release of maven which is compatible with Java 1.4. When maven 2.2.1 is configured as default external maven installation m2eclipse 0.9.9 refuses to build projects (like maven core plugins) which still require Java 1.4. Maybe