I've updated the metadata:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/.meta/repository-metadata.xml
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Carlos Sanchez car...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Christian,
Thanks for providing the repo!
Please subscribe to repo-maintain...@maven.apache.org, that's the list
for repository
Hi,
during my development of a Maven Plugin i came to point where I'm a little
but confused...
I've written an integration test for the plugin (Reporting Plugin)...
But now i got the following message during my integration-test:
[INFO] [site:site {execution: default-site}]
[INFO] artifact
Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
Does exist a way to suppress the update check
Sure, specify the version of the skin in the site descriptor as
illustrated in [0].
Benjamin
[0]
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-site-plugin/examples/sitedescriptor.html
I make the occasional submissions to the junit project, and I wanted to
submit a pom.xml that'd convert it into a proper maven project.
My real question is what/if anything should be done to the groupId of junit.
it should probably be org.junit but has since the beginning of time been
just junit.
Hi all,
I have a couple of issues with the current WAR plugin and the way it
packages class files in JAR files (archiveClasses and attachClasses
configuration options), as these two options work independently of each
other:
* archiveClasses moves all class files (and related resources) from
Hi Benjamin,
Does exist a way to suppress the update check
Sure, specify the version of the skin in the site descriptor as
illustrated in [0].
Sometimes it's very simple...thanks...
But...there is coming up a question about this...doesn't that mean that the
dependency has mentioned
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Kristian Rosenvold
kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote:
I make the occasional submissions to the junit project, and I wanted to
submit a pom.xml that'd convert it into a proper maven project.
My real question is what/if anything should be done to the groupId of
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Peter Lynch pe...@peterlynch.ca wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Kristian Rosenvold
kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote:
it should probably be org.junit but has since the beginning of time
been
just junit. I know at least surefire would need to be
Justin Edelson wrote:
I think the problem Kristian is identifying is that the junit:junit group
and artifact ids are hard-coded in the SurefirePlugin class. Relocation
won't help with this AFAICT.
It's already configurable [0] and could probably be extended to
recognize the new ids by
Ok, I'll consider this decided and get the CLA in and the account request made.
On 2010-01-04, at 2:47 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
I have reviewed the patches for the parallel build support and I think they
are great.
I think we should just give Kristian access to work with Dan and
1) I'm encountering some integration failures in my build at work when
using -Dmaven.threads.experimental=1; I'll try to turn them into proper
bugs in the next few days.
2) In the documentation on http://github.com/krosenvold/maven3/ it says
that it does not yet build Maven 3. Does this
11 matches
Mail list logo