Re: Cleanup to SNAPSHOT version handling

2010-12-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Dec 28, 2010, at 6:06 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Brian E. Fox wrote: > >> -1 to a, +1 to b > > Just to be clear, I meant a) AND b), not either or. a) is concerned about the > actual version interpretation, b) about guiding the user into the desired > direction for future projects. > >

Re: Cleanup to SNAPSHOT version handling

2010-12-28 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Brian E. Fox wrote: -1 to a, +1 to b Just to be clear, I meant a) AND b), not either or. a) is concerned about the actual version interpretation, b) about guiding the user into the desired direction for future projects. In light of this, I'm not sure what your "-1 to a" means. Benjamin

Re: Moving scm to java 1.5

2010-12-28 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1 since we moved that way for 2.2 and 3, I think we can safely move all of our cosebases to 1.6 as needed --Brian (mobile) On Dec 28, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > As we will start a new year, I'd like to move scm to java 1.5. > Let me know if you have any trouble regarding t

Re: Cleanup to SNAPSHOT version handling

2010-12-28 Thread Brian E. Fox
-1 to a, +1 to b --Brian (mobile) On Dec 28, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Dec 28, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > >> Brett Porter wrote: >> >>> I think the original reason the logic is how it is was because just >>> "SNAPSHOT" (with no leading version) was va

Re: Moving scm to java 1.5

2010-12-28 Thread Dennis Lundberg
+1 On 2010-12-28 21:15, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > As we will start a new year, I'd like to move scm to java 1.5. > Let me know if you have any trouble regarding this . (jira entry > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-591) > > Thanks, -- Dennis Lundberg -

Re: Moving scm to java 1.5

2010-12-28 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Stephane Nicoll wrote: > +1 > > S. > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > > > Hi, > > As we will start a new year, I'd like to move scm to java 1.5. > > Let me know if you have any trouble regarding this . (jira entry > > http://jira.code

Re: Moving scm to java 1.5

2010-12-28 Thread Stephane Nicoll
+1 S. On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > As we will start a new year, I'd like to move scm to java 1.5. > Let me know if you have any trouble regarding this . (jira entry > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-591) > > Thanks, > -- > Olivier Lamy > http://twitter.com/ol

Re: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-12-28 Thread Stephane Nicoll
She has no more left. That sounds obvious, no? :) On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: > Just two days? It's Christmas week -- you deserve many more days off than > that :) > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Julia Antonova >wrote: > > > > > I will be out of the office starti

Re: Moving scm to java 1.5

2010-12-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 On Dec 28, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > As we will start a new year, I'd like to move scm to java 1.5. > Let me know if you have any trouble regarding this . (jira entry > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-591) > > Thanks, > -- > Olivier Lamy > http://twitter.com/olamy > h

Re: Moving scm to java 1.5

2010-12-28 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 - Stephen --- Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the screen On 28 Dec 2010 20:16, "Olivier Lamy" wrote: > Hi, > As we will start a new year, I'd like to move scm to java 1.5. > Let me

Re: Moving scm to java 1.5

2010-12-28 Thread Evgeny Mandrikov
+1 2010/12/28 Arnaud Héritier > +1 > > Arnaud > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Kristian Rosenvold > wrote: > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional command

Re: Moving scm to java 1.5

2010-12-28 Thread Arnaud Héritier
+1 Arnaud On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > +1 > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -

Re: Moving scm to java 1.5

2010-12-28 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: Moving scm to java 1.5

2010-12-28 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Olivier Lamy wrote: As we will start a new year, I'd like to move scm to java 1.5. +1 Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Moving scm to java 1.5

2010-12-28 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, As we will start a new year, I'd like to move scm to java 1.5. Let me know if you have any trouble regarding this . (jira entry http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-591) Thanks, -- Olivier Lamy http://twitter.com/olamy http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy -

Re: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-12-28 Thread Paul Benedict
Just two days? It's Christmas week -- you deserve many more days off than that :) On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Julia Antonova wrote: > > I will be out of the office starting 28.12.2010 and will not return until > 30.12.2010. > > I have no acces to my mailbox, I will reply to your message up

Re: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-12-28 Thread Stephen Connolly
Can somebody not on a smart phone update the wiki again ;-) - Stephen --- Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the screen On 28 Dec 2010 18:24, "Julia Antonova" wrote: > > I will be out of

Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-12-28 Thread Julia Antonova
I will be out of the office starting 28.12.2010 and will not return until 30.12.2010. I have no acces to my mailbox, I will reply to your message upon return. For urgent issues please contact my colleagues (Nov.08-12): Svetlana Butova / Administration - secretary...@tumlare.com Irina Pashina / A

Re: Cleanup to SNAPSHOT version handling

2010-12-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Dec 28, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Brett Porter wrote: > >> I think the original reason the logic is how it is was because just >> "SNAPSHOT" (with no leading version) was valid, but that behaviour has long >> been (unofficially) deprecated. > > Given this style of versi

Re: Cleanup to SNAPSHOT version handling

2010-12-28 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Brett Porter wrote: I think the original reason the logic is how it is was because just "SNAPSHOT" (with no leading version) was valid, but that behaviour has long been (unofficially) deprecated. Given this style of versioning is apparently in use and I personally see nothing wrong with hav