Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Checkstyle Plugin version 2.10

+1 2013/2/17 Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org: Hi, We solved N issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11127styleName=Htmlversion=18318 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: Surefire - Run tests on remote hosts through SSH

On 18 February 2013 21:55, Julien Nicoulaud julien.nicoul...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks for the heads up. I took a deeper look at Surefire code, and it seems to me this could be done directly on the client side by just wrapping CommandLineUtils.executeCommandLine() in ForkStarter (

Re: Surefire - Run tests on remote hosts through SSH

On 19 February 2013 09:37, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: On 18 February 2013 21:55, Julien Nicoulaud julien.nicoul...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks for the heads up. I took a deeper look at Surefire code, and it seems to me this could be done directly on the client

Re: Surefire - Run tests on remote hosts through SSH

We actually still support forking all the way down to 1.3. The reason we have no issues for this is A) No-one is using it. B) it works as advertised. Take your pick ;) Kristian 2013/2/19 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com On 19 February 2013 09:37, Stephen Connolly

[VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.5

Hi, We fixed 1 issue: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=19088 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-270/ Staging distribution: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/maven/maven-3/3.0.5/ Vote open for 72H [+1] [0]

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.5

+1 On 19 February 2013 15:28, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, We fixed 1 issue: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=19088 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-270/ Staging distribution:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.5

Hi, +1 (non binding from me). Tested serveral project no regressions found. Kind regards Karl-Heinz Marbaise -- SoftwareEntwicklung Beratung SchulungTel.: +49 (0) 2405 / 415 893 Dipl.Ing.(FH) Karl-Heinz MarbaiseICQ#: 135949029 Hauptstrasse 177 USt.IdNr:

Re: maven-pmd-plugin 3.0 is completely broken (MPMD-163 PMD issues are reported multiple times)

Thanks for the patch. Before releasing, I will wait some days if any other issues. 2013/2/19 Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com: Hello, I created an issue[1] and supplied a small fix with working unittests and tested integratively against the project mentioned in the ticket, got the

Plugin Development - Injection of component

Hi, currently I'm working on a plugin which works so far so good...but now i stumbled over a problem which i didn't understand... I have a dependency to maven-invoker artifact: dependency groupIdorg.apache.maven.shared/groupId artifactIdmaven-invoker/artifactId

Re: Plugin Development - Injection of component

InvocationRequest is not a Component, it is just an interface for DefaultInvocationRequest. Just use: InvocationRequest request = new DefaultInvocationRequest(); Robert Op Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:39:45 +0100 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de: Hi, currently I'm working on a

Re: Plugin Development - Injection of component

On 19 Feb 2013, at 17:39, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, currently I'm working on a plugin which works so far so good...but now i stumbled over a problem which i didn't understand... I have a dependency to maven-invoker artifact: dependency

Re: Plugin Development - Injection of component

Hi Robert, Hi Stuart, InvocationRequest is not a Component, it is just an interface for DefaultInvocationRequest. oh my lord... ;-( Thanks for enlighten me... Which means in other words to make the InvocationRequest being a component it's missing simply this: @Component( role =

Re: Plugin Development - Injection of component

On 19 Feb 2013, at 18:08, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi Robert, Hi Stuart, InvocationRequest is not a Component, it is just an interface for DefaultInvocationRequest. oh my lord... ;-( Thanks for enlighten me... Which means in other words to make the InvocationRequest being a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.5

+1 S. On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, We fixed 1 issue: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=19088 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-270/ Staging distribution:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.5

On 19 Feb 2013, at 15:28, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hi, We fixed 1 issue: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=19088 ^ see also http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10335version=18697 for what went into Wagon 2.4 Staging repository:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.5

+1 Op Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:28:02 +0100 schreef Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: Hi, We fixed 1 issue: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=19088 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-270/ Staging distribution:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.5

On 02/19/2013 10:28 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: We fixed 1 issue: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=19088 I guess this means that fixes such as MNG-5312 are deferred to another release like 3.1.0? [1] https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5312

Re: Plugin Development - Injection of component

Hi Stuart, Setting aside the issue of whether DefaultInvocationRequest should really be a component, note that @Component by default defines a singleton component. You need to add: instantiationStrategy = per-lookup to get a new instance on every lookup, otherwise you'd always get the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.5

2013/2/19 Jesse Glick jgl...@cloudbees.com: On 02/19/2013 10:28 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: We fixed 1 issue: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=19088 I guess this means that fixes such as MNG-5312 are deferred to another release like 3.1.0? correct.

Re: Plugin Development - Injection of component

With a request-object we have to pass only one object instead of a lot of arguments. This makes it a lot easier to maintain, because the method signature will never change. It's no problem to add new fields to the request. The same counts for response-objects, when used. Most request-object

Re: Rejig the front page

This has been quite for about 10 days. Is there any consensus on what the update should look like? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: Rejig the front page

I got distracted by some sparkly thing... I will reboot shortly... Still waiting for a good entry to use as a starting hook though On Wednesday, 20 February 2013, Barrie Treloar wrote: This has been quite for about 10 days. Is there any consensus on what the update should look like?

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Checkstyle Plugin version 2.10

+1 Regards, Hervé Le dimanche 17 février 2013 15:48:59 Dennis Lundberg a écrit : Hi, We solved N issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11127styleName=H tmlversion=18318 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Checkstyle Plugin version 2.10

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:48:59 +0100 Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: +1 (non-binding) thanks, tony. Hi, We solved N issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11127styleName=Htmlversion=18318 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.5

On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:28:02 +0100 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: hourra to a new release of maven :) +1 (non-binding) works fine to me thanks, tony. Hi, We fixed 1 issue: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=19088 Staging repository: