[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Wagon version 2.5

2013-09-12 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Hi, We solved 6 issues: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10335version=19092 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20WAGON%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC Staging repo:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

2013-09-12 Thread Stevo Slavić
+1 (non-binding) tested on Apache Mahout trunk Kind regards, Stevo Slavic. On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: On Sep 10, 2013, at 12:16 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 September 2013 16:33, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: -1 The

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

2013-09-12 Thread sebb
On 10 September 2013 16:33, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: -1 The src.tar.gz and src.zip files have lost their top level NOTICE and LICENSE files. This is a regression from 3.1.0 (and 3.0.5). That definitely needs to be fixed. I don't have time today to look into that, but might

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

2013-09-12 Thread Arnaud Héritier
-1 due to the issue found by Dan about Notice and License files Otherwise I tested it on various projects and found no regressions Cheers On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Stevo Slavić ssla...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (non-binding) tested on Apache Mahout trunk Kind regards, Stevo Slavic. On

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

2013-09-12 Thread Arnaud Héritier
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:44 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 September 2013 16:33, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: -1 The src.tar.gz and src.zip files have lost their top level NOTICE and LICENSE files. This is a regression from 3.1.0 (and 3.0.5). That definitely needs

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

2013-09-12 Thread Robert Scholte
-1 for the same reason as Dan and Arnaud, though found no regression. Robert Op Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:49:06 +0200 schreef Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com: -1 due to the issue found by Dan about Notice and License files Otherwise I tested it on various projects and found no regressions

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

2013-09-12 Thread Daniel Kulp
This should now be fixed on master. Feel free to cancel this vote and respin the builds. Thanks! Dan On Sep 10, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: -1 The src.tar.gz and src.zip files have lost their top level NOTICE and LICENSE files. This is a regression from

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

2013-09-12 Thread sebb
On 12 September 2013 14:52, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:44 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 September 2013 16:33, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: -1 The src.tar.gz and src.zip files have lost their top level NOTICE and LICENSE files.

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

2013-09-12 Thread Jason van Zyl
Right o, thanks. On Sep 12, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: This should now be fixed on master. Feel free to cancel this vote and respin the builds. Thanks! Dan On Sep 10, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: -1 The src.tar.gz and

Re: git commit: Add a LICENSE/NOTICE that can be picked up for the src assembly

2013-09-12 Thread sebb
On 11 September 2013 21:40, dk...@apache.org wrote: Updated Branches: refs/heads/master 02d124230 - eb2f2b1ac Add a LICENSE/NOTICE that can be picked up for the src assembly Thanks, that also sorts out the top-level SCM NL files. Project:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

2013-09-12 Thread Arnaud Héritier
The point is: the NL files should be at the top-level of SCM. That is because SCM URLs are published, so the readers need to know the what the license conditions are. For the License when you are reading some code hosted on apache.org I think nobody should have a doubt about it. The

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

2013-09-12 Thread sebb
On 12 September 2013 18:20, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote: The point is: the NL files should be at the top-level of SCM. That is because SCM URLs are published, so the readers need to know the what the license conditions are. For the License when you are reading some code

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

2013-09-12 Thread Baptiste Mathus
2013/9/12 sebb seb...@gmail.com On 12 September 2013 14:52, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:44 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 September 2013 16:33, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: -1 The src.tar.gz and src.zip files have lost

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Wagon version 2.5

2013-09-12 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 On 12 September 2013 21:29, Tamás Cservenák ta...@cservenak.net wrote: Hi, We solved 6 issues: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10335version=19092 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: