Re: [DISCUSS] Move everything to 1.6

2014-09-29 Thread Manfred Moser
+100 .. I totally agree. RIP Maven 2.x EOL Maven 3.0.x very soon And more importantly... update the website and clearly document that state. manfred Stephen Connolly wrote on 29.09.2014 12:35: > well one thing I would like us to do better is communicate exactly which > release lines of Maven

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Resources Plugin version 2.7

2014-09-29 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, We solved 6 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11145&version=18645 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MRESOURCES%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC Staging repo: https:

Re: maven-jxr-plugin

2014-09-29 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Brett, On 9/29/14 11:27 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Yep, add it to the .htaccess in the top level site is the convention used - there are other examples in there already. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/site/trunk/content/filtered-resources/.htaccess Thanks... I will give it a try...

Re: maven-jxr-plugin

2014-09-29 Thread Brett Porter
Yep, add it to the .htaccess in the top level site is the convention used - there are other examples in there already. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/site/trunk/content/filtered-resources/.htaccess Cheers, Brett On 30 Sep 2014, at 6:26 am, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > i want t

maven-jxr-plugin

2014-09-29 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, i want to know if we have way of redirect which can be activated for this page: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-jxr-plugin/ which is out of date and should be: http://maven.apache.org/jxr/maven-jxr-plugin/ Kind regards Karl-Heinz Marbaise --

Re: [DISCUSS] Move everything to 1.6

2014-09-29 Thread Stephen Connolly
well one thing I would like us to do better is communicate exactly which release lines of Maven we are actively maintaining and what we mean by such active maintenance. My personal view is * if there has been no commit to a release line for > 1 year then it is not in active maintenance * if ther

Re: [DISCUSS] Move everything to 1.6

2014-09-29 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Well why I recall we said last time was that we'd only support the jdk > supported by the supported versions of maven > > So *if* one of the core plugins chooses - for technical reasons (such as > try with resources or the diamond operator

Re: [DISCUSS] Move everything to 1.6

2014-09-29 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi Kristian, > > On 9/27/14 7:23 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: >> >> We moved core to 1.6 some time ago. > > > As far as i know starting with Maven 3.2.1...was the first one... > >> >> >> Time to move everything else as well ? > > > We

[GitHub] maven pull request: [MNG-5696] Remove dependency on Easymock

2014-09-29 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/25 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable

Re: [mojo-dev] [ANN] extra-enforcer-rules 1.0-beta-3 Released

2014-09-29 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, I still consider Maven as a language independent build management tool. In case of the enforceBytecodeVersion I think we should add an API so it can be implemented for other packaging types as well. Shouldn't be too hard to do so, just needs to be done. @Stephen, which other rules do you h

Re: [mojo-dev] [ANN] extra-enforcer-rules 1.0-beta-3 Released

2014-09-29 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Stephen, On 9/29/14 10:36 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: Some of those look ready to move over to the standard enforcer rules: e.g. enforce bytecode version for one. WDYT? Sounds like a good idea... Kind regards Karl-Heinz Marbaise On 26 September 2014 21:31, Baptiste Mathus wrote: Hi,

[GitHub] maven pull request: [MNG-5696] Remove dependency on Easymock

2014-09-29 Thread mizdebsk
GitHub user mizdebsk opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/25 [MNG-5696] Remove dependency on Easymock maven-compat has a test dependency on easymock, which is not really used for anything. Dependency on easymock should be removed. JIRA bug report: htt

Re: [mojo-dev] [ANN] extra-enforcer-rules 1.0-beta-3 Released

2014-09-29 Thread Stephen Connolly
Some of those look ready to move over to the standard enforcer rules: e.g. enforce bytecode version for one. WDYT? On 26 September 2014 21:31, Baptiste Mathus wrote: > Hi, > > The Mojo team is pleased to announce the release of the Extra Enforcer > Rules version 1.0-beta-2. > > Apache's Maven E

Re: Seems like I have totally and fully broken windows support on trunk

2014-09-29 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Virtualbox to the rescue. I'm looking at it :) Kristian 2014-09-29 8:38 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold : > Using java 7 or better: > > git clone https://github.com/sonatype/plexus-io.git > > git clone https://github.com/sonatype/plexus-archiver.git > > > On maven-war-plugin (trunk), update plexu

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Javadoc Plugin version 2.10.1

2014-09-29 Thread Anders Hammar
me too. :-) /Anders On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Kristian Rosenvold < kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote: > I moved the "fix" to 2.11. > > Kristian > > > 2014-09-29 8:50 GMT+02:00 Mikolaj Izdebski : > > On 09/27/2014 04:34 PM, Michael Osipov wrote: > >> We solved 3 issues: > >> > http://jir