Re: [VOTE] Maven Assembly Plugin 3.0.0

Well it's not a big problem and not too long to fix. I will fix that and do an other vote on Wednesday. I hope to not have a -1 for a checkstyle issue! :P On 7 November 2016 at 10:39, Benson Margulies wrote: > There is no reason to cancel over one missing link. If there

Re: [VOTE] Maven Assembly Plugin 3.0.0

There is no reason to cancel over one missing link. If there are enough +1 votes, the vote passes. There's no need to view a -1 as a veto, especially if it's something that can be fixed up later. On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2016-11-07 um 00:13

Re: [VOTE] Maven Assembly Plugin 3.0.0

Am 2016-11-07 um 00:13 schrieb Olivier Lamy: Hi So I have to cancel. Always funny to see old issues popping up and turning as critical when someone want to release :P @Michael Regarding https://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/index.html if you mention the link from breadcrumb that's

Re: [VOTE] Maven Assembly Plugin 3.0.0

Hi So I have to cancel. Always funny to see old issues popping up and turning as critical when someone want to release :P @Michael Regarding https://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/index.html if you mention the link from breadcrumb that's something generated by site plugin and it's a

Re: Build behavior differences between 3.2.5 and 3.3.9 with dependency shading

Hmmm I did some digging... https://maven.apache.org/ref/3.2.3/apidocs/org/apache/maven/artifact/handler/ArtifactHandler.html#isIncludesDependencies() is i think the idea JvZ was hinting at. For the case where a shaded JAR shades *everything* then a custom packaging will work as we could set this

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Site Plugin version 3.6

Hi, We solved 14 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? projectId=12317923=12335570=Text There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012317923%20AND

[VOTE] Release Maven Fluido Skin version 1.6

Hi, We solved 7 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317926=12335711 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

[GitHub] maven issue #95: [MNG-6110] updated Aether to Maven Resolver 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT

Github user michael-o commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/95 > Should maven-aether-provider be renamed? From my POM, yes, but in a separate ticket. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub

[GitHub] maven pull request #95: [MNG-6110] updated Aether to Maven Resolver 1.2.0-SN...

GitHub user hwellmann opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/95 [MNG-6110] updated Aether to Maven Resolver 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT TODO: * Upgrade to 1.2.0 once it's released. * Should `maven-aether-provider` be renamed? * Update Javadoc link for Maven