Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Christian Schulte
Am 02/24/17 um 21:03 schrieb Stephen Connolly: > To reflect the practice we should use for these going forward +1 I should have included -alpha-0 in those ranges right from the start. Regards, -- Christian - To unsubscribe, e

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Stephen Connolly
To reflect the practice we should use for these going forward On Fri 24 Feb 2017 at 19:54, Robert Scholte wrote: > ... ,3.5.0-alpha-0) > > sure, effect is the same, but why not ",3.5.0-alpha-1)" to reflect an > existing version > > Robert > > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:51:18 +0100, Stephen Connolly

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Robert Scholte
... ,3.5.0-alpha-0) sure, effect is the same, but why not ",3.5.0-alpha-1)" to reflect an existing version Robert On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:51:18 +0100, Stephen Connolly wrote: c4cd8cf3b5e4c6d0a7f52a3d282229bda29b5f58 in maven-integration-testing should fix this issue On 24 February 2017

Re: maven-integration-testing git commit: 3.5.0-alpha-1 < 3.5.0

2017-02-24 Thread Christian Schulte
Am 02/24/17 um 20:48 schrieb steph...@apache.org: > Repository: maven-integration-testing > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master 3883e005e -> c4cd8cf3b > > > 3.5.0-alpha-1 < 3.5.0 Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Stephen Connolly
c4cd8cf3b5e4c6d0a7f52a3d282229bda29b5f58 in maven-integration-testing should fix this issue On 24 February 2017 at 19:39, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > 3.5.0 > 3.5.0-alpha-1 > > On 24 February 2017 at 19:38, Guillaume Boué wrote: > >> I also ran the ITs on a Window

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Stephen Connolly
3.5.0 > 3.5.0-alpha-1 On 24 February 2017 at 19:38, Guillaume Boué wrote: > I also ran the ITs on a Windows machine, hitting the same error in the > tests as mentioned by Robert. Additionally, I had the following errors: > > Failed tests: > MavenITmng2199ParentVersionRangeTest>AbstractMavenInteg

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Stephen Connolly
The version range may not work for 3.5.0-alpha-1 is all On 24 February 2017 at 19:33, Christian Schulte wrote: > Am 02/24/17 um 18:34 schrieb Robert Scholte: > > When running the maven-its, I get this failing test. I think the cause is > > an invalid version range, right? > > Are you really runn

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Guillaume Boué
I also ran the ITs on a Windows machine, hitting the same error in the tests as mentioned by Robert. Additionally, I had the following errors: Failed tests: MavenITmng2199ParentVersionRangeTest>AbstractMavenIntegrationTestCase.runTest:244 Expected failure when with Maven version 3.5.0-alpha-1 M

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Christian Schulte
Am 02/24/17 um 18:34 schrieb Robert Scholte: > When running the maven-its, I get this failing test. I think the cause is > an invalid version range, right? Are you really running the IT master branch? There have been no commits to maven master without a successful IT run before. I wonder how thi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Robert Scholte
When running the maven-its, I get this failing test. I think the cause is an invalid version range, right? Robert Tests in error: MavenITmng5805PkgTypeMojoConfiguration>AbstractMavenIntegrationTestCase.runTest:222->testPkgTypeMojoConfiguration:27 ╗ Verification On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, On 24/02/17 15:59, Petr Široký wrote: Hello, I've tested the 3.5.0-alpha-1 with several quite large projects (hundreds of modules in total) and everything looks good. +1 non-binding (hopefully I understood correctly I can do that) Petr Thanks...appreciate your feedback... And of cour

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, highly appreciated to have some feedback from the community... Thanks for that. Karl Heinz Marbaise On 24/02/17 08:58, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: Hello I'm not sure if I can give any vote (even non-binding +1), but I tested several large OSGi projects using 3.5.0-alpha-1 without problems. r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Petar Tahchiev
+1 I've been testing today with our projects and it all looks good. 2017-02-24 16:59 GMT+02:00 Petr Široký : > Hello, > > I've tested the 3.5.0-alpha-1 with several quite large projects (hundreds > of modules in total) and everything looks good. > > +1 non-binding (hopefully I understood correct

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Petr Široký
Hello, I've tested the 3.5.0-alpha-1 with several quite large projects (hundreds of modules in total) and everything looks good. +1 non-binding (hopefully I understood correctly I can do that) Petr On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:13 AM Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > ht

Re: Build of maven-dependency-analyzer fails on Windows.

2017-02-24 Thread Robert Scholte
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 03:08:10 +0100, Christian Schulte wrote: Am 02/20/17 um 18:28 schrieb Robert Scholte: On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 02:17:12 +0100, Christian Schulte wrote: Am 02/20/17 um 01:53 schrieb Christian Schulte: Hi, I cannot build 'maven-dependency-analyzer' trunk on Windows. Is ther

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Stephen Connolly
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6178 created On 23 February 2017 at 21:56, Christian Schulte wrote: > Can we have this patch included? I wanted to commit this to master > yesterday when the build job succeeded. This is just pending the Jenkins > update to get the job succeed. I would j

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Stephen Connolly
While we have a legal requirement to get at least 3x+1 votes from PMC members (which are know as binding votes), all votes are welcome. The more reports we have from the community, the better! On Fri 24 Feb 2017 at 07:58, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > I'm not sure if I can give any vote (