Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

+1 Non Binding. Bring. It. On. On 4 Apr 2017, at 10:14, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 86 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922=12336084=Text -- Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://www.chaliceofblood.net

Re: No helping on the 3.5.0 release checklist...

11. Run the source release analyzer ( https://github.com/stephenc/source-release-validator/commit/2e91ac959d0320a509e023b11b6389cc05719cdb) and reply to the vote with the results. On 3 April 2017 at 23:18, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Note to self, here's all the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

Analyzer... stagingUrl: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1326 groupId: org.apache.maven artifactId: apache-maven version: 3.5.0 Source ZIP url exists.

No helping on the 3.5.0 release checklist...

Note to self, here's all the steps so far 1. $ export JAVA_HOME=jdk7 2. $ export PATH=${JAVA_HOME}/bin:${PATH} 3. $ mvn release:prepare release:perform 4. $ cd target/checkout 5. $ export MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m 6. Close staging repo 7. $ mvn -Preporting site site:stage 8. $ mvn

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

Hi, We solved 86 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922=12336084=Text In there are 324 issues left in JIRA for Maven core:

Re: "Unextractable" JAR files created by assembly:single on Linux

Am 2017-04-03 um 23:02 schrieb Robert Scholte: Hi, is there anybody who can verify/confirm this issue[1]? This would be a serious problem. I can, see my message on the issue. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MASSEMBLY-851 --- Forwarded message --- From: "Tom Wieczorek

"Unextractable" JAR files created by assembly:single on Linux

Hi, is there anybody who can verify/confirm this issue[1]? This would be a serious problem. Robert [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MASSEMBLY-851 --- Forwarded message --- From: "Tom Wieczorek (JIRA)" To: rfscho...@apache.org Cc: Subject: [jira] [Comment

Re: Idea plugin

Plugin is EOL as the native pom support in IDEA is better On 3 April 2017 at 20:28, Paul Hammant wrote: > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-idea-plugin/ > > It is marked as "retired", yet it is still available for resolution through > regular dependency declarations. Bug

Re: All go for 3.5.0

Ok, I'm a go! On 3 April 2017 at 16:16, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Solaris 11, Java 8 > > Tests run: 790, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: > 5,158.863 sec - in org.apache.maven.it.IntegrationTestSuite > > > Results : > > > Tests run: 790,

Idea plugin

http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-idea-plugin/ It is marked as "retired", yet it is still available for resolution through regular dependency declarations. Bug reports are referred to JIRA on Codehaus (RIP). Can we get https://github.com/apache/maven-idea-plugin 1) setup, 2) the GH issue

Re: Apache owned index of Maven-Central artifacts?

OK I'll shut up then. While I might hope for a slim front-end-only read-only UI for 'central' it's compete with Nexus, which Sonatype sell, so asking them to host something (that I could write solo) would be beyond cheeky. On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Manfred Moser

Re: Apache owned index of Maven-Central artifacts?

Fyi the URL repo.maven.apache.org points to the same hosts as repo repo1.maven.org, which are all running on the Sonatype-sponsored infrastructure. More detail and such are at http://central.sonatype.org/ Manfred Stephen Connolly wrote on 2017-04-03 10:57: > Sonatype owns the host that our

Re: Apache owned index of Maven-Central artifacts?

Sonatype owns the host that our DNA name resolves to. In the (unlikely) event that sonatype ceases to provide the service this would allow us to move to another provider, but there would be a lot of work establishing content routes to publish to central in that event. On Mon 3 Apr 2017 at 17:46,

Re: Apache owned index of Maven-Central artifacts?

Specifically, that domain - https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2 on fastly.net infra ? On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Manfred Moser wrote: > Just to clarify... the whole infrastructure for Maven Central aka the > Central Repository is maintained and sponsored by

Re: Apache owned index of Maven-Central artifacts?

Just to clarify... the whole infrastructure for Maven Central aka the Central Repository is maintained and sponsored by Sonatype. manfred Paul Hammant wrote on 2017-04-03 07:07: > My bad - I'll explain more fully - I'm thinking of a read-only interface > for querying the data within a maven

Re: All go for 3.5.0

Solaris 11, Java 8 Tests run: 790, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 5,158.863 sec - in org.apache.maven.it.IntegrationTestSuite Results : Tests run: 790, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-jar-plugin:2.5:jar (default-jar) @ core-it-suite --- [INFO]

Re: All go for 3.5.0

Solaris 11, Java 7 Tests run: 790, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 4,826.395 sec - in org.apache.maven.it.IntegrationTestSuite Results : Tests run: 790, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-jar-plugin:2.5:jar (default-jar) @ core-it-suite --- [INFO]

Re: All go for 3.5.0

IBM Java 8 (I do not believe these are regressions) Tests run: 790, Failures: 2, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 5,046.157 sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.maven.it.IntegrationTestSuite testBad(org.apache.maven.it.MavenITmng5958LifecyclePhaseBinaryCompat) Time elapsed: 2.948 sec <<<

Re: All go for 3.5.0

Azul's Zulu JDK 8 Tests run: 790, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3,552.011 sec - in org.apache.maven.it.IntegrationTestSuite Results : Tests run: 790, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-jar-plugin:2.5:jar (default-jar) @ core-it-suite --- [INFO]

Re: Apache owned index of Maven-Central artifacts?

My bad - I'll explain more fully - I'm thinking of a read-only interface for querying the data within a maven repo. I'm thinking of something that is entirely static. Specifically it would use JavaScript Angular/React/Vue and static JSON or maybe projname.POM files directly from JavaScript. I'm

Want to cut release version today evening

We fixed 65 issues this year and going to cut a new release version of surefire project. Thanks to all developers and testers. The master will be intact. We will again continue development and testing branches until we reach the consensus which was found as good experience. We were facing quite

Re: All go for 3.5.0

solaris 10, jdk 8 Tests run: 790, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2,753.791 sec - in org.apache.maven.it.IntegrationTestSuite Results : Tests run: 790, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-jar-plugin:2.5:jar (default-jar) @ core-it-suite --- [INFO]

Re: All go for 3.5.0

Go go go for 3.5.0 release !! On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think all issues remaining are addressed. > > If anyone wants to take some final manual testing of core, please do so as > my plan is to shoot direct for 3.5.0 rather

Re: All go for 3.5.0

Solaris 10, jdk 7 Tests run: 790, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2,076.502 sec - in org.apache.maven.it.IntegrationTestSuite Results : Tests run: 790, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-jar-plugin:2.5:jar (default-jar) @ core-it-suite --- [INFO]

Re: maven-integration-testing git commit: Add some exotic test environments

It would be good if somebody could contribute some others, e.g. freebsd especially I can probably tweak this to give solaris-10-jdk8 (and rename current one to solaris-10-jdk7) I am looking into a good base image for solaris-11 For the linuxes, we can probably use Dockerfiles instead as they