Re: Artifact "has been attached with deprecated code" warning

2017-06-06 Thread Guillaume Boué
Thanks for confirming this Karl. So in this case, I think that part of the code in maven-artifact-transfer can be safely deleted (calling setRepository and catching an exception). The repository to deploy to is set on the main artifact and, even if it didn't throw an exception, there would be

Re: Artifact "has been attached with deprecated code" warning

2017-06-06 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, On 06/06/17 22:38, Guillaume Boué wrote: In the new API ProjectDeployer (in maven-artifact-transfer), I noticed the default implementation raises a warning in the case that it cannot set the repository to an attached artifact: Yes this code has been "stolen" from the maven-deploy-plugin

Re: Version 3.0.0 on JIRA for MANTRUN

2017-06-06 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, On 06/06/17 22:05, Guillaume Boué wrote: Hi guys, The AntRun plugin was migrated to Maven 3 in svn.apache.org/r1796930. Can someone rename the 3.0 version that currently exists on JIRA to 3.0.0? I can then start closing a bunch of issues with this fix version. Done.. Kind regards Karl

Artifact "has been attached with deprecated code" warning

2017-06-06 Thread Guillaume Boué
In the new API ProjectDeployer (in maven-artifact-transfer), I noticed the default implementation raises a warning in the case that it cannot set the repository to an attached artifact:

Version 3.0.0 on JIRA for MANTRUN

2017-06-06 Thread Guillaume Boué
Hi guys, The AntRun plugin was migrated to Maven 3 in svn.apache.org/r1796930. Can someone rename the 3.0 version that currently exists on JIRA to 3.0.0? I can then start closing a bunch of issues with this fix version. Thanks, Guillaume --- L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #114: Parallel runner should not drop away runners that...

2017-06-06 Thread Fuud
Github user Fuud commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114 Any questions? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so,

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #141: SUREFIRE-1331: Bump version number for 3.0.0 rele...

2017-06-06 Thread britter
Github user britter commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/141 @Tibor17 so we can merge this to 3.0-rc1 branch? Than the branch will have the correct SNAPSHOT version. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #146: SUREFIRE-1330: Fix module name in surefire-provid...

2017-06-06 Thread britter
Github user britter commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/146 Thank you! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so,