Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/167
@DaGeRe
Pls run the build `mvn install -P run-its "-Djdk.home=e:\Program
Files\Java\jdk9\"` with default JDK 8 and additional JDK9 for few tests as you
can see in system property `jdk.ho
Github user acogoluegnes closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/171
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.or
Github user eolivelli closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/168
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/167
@DaGeRe
Yes we need to add your Jira issue to a final report which is part or final
plugin release.
Only you best know all details to be written in description in Jira,
platform you
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/168
@eolivelli
Thx for contributing. Close this PR. It was pushed to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/171
@acogoluegnes
Thx for support regarding Java 9.
Please close this PR. I extended the test and already pushed to master.
---
-
Github user eolivelli commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/168
@Tibor17 Ihave squashed the commits and reworded the commit msg.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apa
Github user eolivelli commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/168
Ok, will do this afternoon. Thanks
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional command
Here’s the failure. If tracing the root cause usually best to look at
the pipeline steps view of a build as that lets you see the individual
step’s log
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.2:compile
(default-compile) on project maven-release-manager: Com
On Sat 2 Dec 2017 at 10:42, Tibor Digana wrote:
> One function in Jenkinsfile is sick.
> It is pure bureaucracy where the Jenkinsfile becomes a beton.
> There is no freedom for developers in Jenkinsfile in that case.
If you don’t want Java 9 then you can turn off Java 9 using the parameters.
N
One function in Jenkinsfile is sick.
It is pure bureaucracy where the Jenkinsfile becomes a beton.
There is no freedom for developers in Jenkinsfile in that case.
The build does not need to have Java 9. It's not the reason to invest
effort. I invest effort to Jigsaw support, JUnit5 and 3.0.
It is
On Sat 2 Dec 2017 at 10:03, Tibor Digana wrote:
> Pls do not do it!
> I want to have it under control in Jenkinsfile and not to share the code
> with other projects.
I do not see that you actually have anything that needs a custom build.
We can add code coverage to the template.
The only repo
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/168
The comment `[SUREFIRE-1424] javax.transaction.TransactionManager not
visible with Java9` should be in commit.
---
-
To u
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/168
If you could squash these two commits in one, it would be great.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apach
Pls do not do it!
I want to have it under control in Jenkinsfile and not to share the code
with other projects.
Surefire project is different and it must be still different.
I see Groovy libraries useful only in situations when I call Hudson API
functions and I need to avoid security issue on these
15 matches
Mail list logo
