Tomo Suzuki wrote on 23/09/19 3:56 PM:
Does your approach use such file to record library versions?
I don't know about what Hervé is doing, but internally we have a tool I
wrote for handling this, we have a pom.deps file that looks like:
repository http://nexus.XX as public;
impor
> no go for this change
It is likely the easiest way to interpret (and reduce the short term
investment) it but I don't read it this way, more as "it needs more
investment to work and be a core feature usable by everyone so let step the
inclusion with intermediate deliveries" (but it is still a "g
Classification: For internal use only
Hi Enrico,
It's not open sourced for now. We need to spend much efforts according with DB
policies/procedures to make it open source.
That's why we started this discussion, we don't want to waste time if change
conceptually wrong(from Maven Dev Community pe
Hi Alexander and Maximilian. As a former Deutsche Bank RTC employee, I
cannot bypass this topic.
First of all, I'm not speaking for community, neither Jetbrains.
I know how painfull is to get all approvals for open-source contribution in
Deutsche Bank, but may be you can share you solution as a ma
Le 23/09/2019 à 01:52, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> after a few years of testing, thinking, procrastination and hard work (thank
> you Thomas for your talk at Devoxx France 2016 [1]), I think I achieved a key
> step this week-end toward native Reproducible Builds with Maven [2]: Maven
> core itself
