Re: last review of Reproducible Builds proposal

2019-10-07 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 07/10/2019 à 14:40, Andreas Sewe a écrit : > - Can we get something analogous to maven.build.timestamp.format? One > could then write the following to be compatible with env.SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH: > > > > > ${env.SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH} > > ... > > +1, some kind of support for SOURCE_DATE_EP

Re: Consumer pom, use a System property or a pom property ?

2019-10-07 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il lun 7 ott 2019, 20:59 Robert Scholte ha scritto: > bq. I would like to use this feature when Maven 3.7.0 is out > > There's this interesting idea from Stephen to activate it by default, > disabling it explicitly by setting the property to false. > Using it by default is good. After thinking

Re: Consumer pom, use a System property or a pom property ?

2019-10-07 Thread Robert Scholte
bq. I would like to use this feature when Maven 3.7.0 is out There's this interesting idea from Stephen to activate it by default, disabling it explicitly by setting the property to false. I did a Twitter poll, and the result after 100 responses was close to 50/50 The more I think about it,

Re: Consumer pom...a better name like 'public pom' ?

2019-10-07 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Enrico, As you might have noticed, I've changed the title of the related Jira issue. IT is now about build/consumer process. Main reason is that there's no consensus about the definitions of these poms yet. The only thing that is very clear is that your local pom can change during instal

Re: Consumer pom...a better name like 'public pom' ?

2019-10-07 Thread Elliotte Rusty Harold
"dependent POM" That is, the POM used by dependents of this project. On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 2:04 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Hello, > Robert sent out a (great) patch to introduce support for the 'consumer' pom, > that is (if I understand correctly) a skinny pom that contains only useful > info

Re: last review of Reproducible Builds proposal

2019-10-07 Thread Andreas Sewe
Hi, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > based on the feedback I got, I updated the proposal: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=74682318 > > The archives entries timestamp is now configured with > project.build.outputTimestamp property, in ISO-8601 format > > > > 2019

Re: Consumer pom...a better name like 'public pom' ?

2019-10-07 Thread Nick Stolwijk
I think the consumer POM (or maybe consumable POM) is a good name, although I also see something in source and shared pom. I don't think effective POM is a name for this POM. There is a name clash with the effective POM from help:effective-pom which shows the result of the combined POM, parent POM