Re: 3.6.3 release?

2019-10-24 Thread Robert Scholte
There are more critical regressions, so it makes sense to do a Maven 3.6.3 release before working on 3.7.0 @Team, please only merge regression related issues, dependency updates or equivalent fixes. Leave more ambitious issues for the next release. thanks, Robert [1] https://issues.apache.

Re: 3.6.3 release?

2019-10-24 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il gio 24 ott 2019, 15:38 Vladimir Sitnikov ha scritto: > Mickael>there was no other critical issues pending > > I guess https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6771 (licensing issues > with binary artifacts) is a blocker for the release. > Yes I will take care of it, maybe with some help with

Re: 3.6.3 release?

2019-10-24 Thread Vladimir Sitnikov
Mickael>there was no other critical issues pending I guess https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6771 (licensing issues with binary artifacts) is a blocker for the release. Vladimir

3.6.3 release?

2019-10-24 Thread Mickael Istria
Hi all, If I followed correctly previous discussions, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6765 was a candidate for a bugfix release and there was no other critical issues pending. As there is a desire to spin a 3.7.x branch, MNG-6765 and a 3.6.3 releases were considered as blockers. So now

Re: Using Maven JXR as base for report plugin

2019-10-24 Thread Plamen Totev
Hi Enrico, Thanks for the reply. On 24.10.2019 г. 0:57, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il mer 23 ott 2019, 20:29 Plamen Totev ha > scritto: > >> Hi, >> >> I would like to create plugin that generates test coverage report. > Yes, it my have sense. > > As far as I know we do not have a standard way to p