Re: Maven Plugin Tests Need maven-compat to Run

That's a known issue, see  https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Plugin+migration+to+Maven3+dependencies Giving it the test-scope is acceptable. thanks, Robert On 13-6-2020 01:56:46, Ian Lavallee wrote: Hi all, I am working on getting a dependencyGraphBuilder working in its own pro

List of public pgp key servers

Hi, Are there any informations / documentations / recommendations which key servers should be used to publish public key. On site https://maven.apache.org/repository/guide-central-repository-upload.html#pgp-signature we have "like" http://pgp.mit.edu/ and on site https://central.sonatype.org/page

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M5

Hi, We solved 40 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927&version=12344612 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SUREFIRE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC Stag

[GitHub] [maven-site] elharo opened a new pull request #176: [MNGSITE-415] say Maven 3.0.x is EOL

elharo opened a new pull request #176: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/176 Pushed for discussion This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and

Suggestion: announce Maven 3.0.x is EOL

I think we've achieved consensus that Maven 3.0.x should no longer be supported by new plugin releases and 3.1.x is our minimum. Assuming that's true, this PR updates the history page to account for that: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/176 If anyone thinks we have not achieved consensu

[GitHub] [maven-site] Tibor17 commented on pull request #176: [MNGSITE-415] say Maven 3.0.x is EOL

Tibor17 commented on pull request #176: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/176#issuecomment-643656541 +1 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub

Re: Suggestion: announce Maven 3.0.x is EOL

Thx that you have made this. yes, i also understood a general acceptance of this proposal. let's push this soon. On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 5:26 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > I think we've achieved consensus that Maven 3.0.x should no longer be > supported by new plugin releases and 3.1.x is ou

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M5

Mainly just ran some sanity checks but looks ok, +1 (non binding) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn

Re: Suggestion: announce Maven 3.0.x is EOL

To me these are 2 different things. Yes, we are going to require Maven 3.1 for our plugins (and because of API changes we need to be explicit about this), but that doesn't mean that Maven 3.0.x itself is end of life. Depending on how you ask the question, to me EOLs are either about majors or m

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M5

Am 2020-06-13 um 15:46 schrieb Tibor Digana: Hi, We solved 40 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927&version=12344612 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SUREFIRE%20AND%20status%20

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M5

(I will cast my final vote on Monday) Tibor It is worth to note that this release includes the new communication protocol between Maven and the forked JVM. Can you please share a bit of help about how to try it? This is a great release of surefire, it is a big milestone for Maven and Surefire En

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M5

+1 near full reproducibility of reference artifacts with JDK 8 on Windows: 48 artifacts are ok, just 2 still have issues: - surefire-3.0.0-M5-source-release.zip: I don't know why my local build added 3 dependency-reduced-pom.xml that do not exist in reference build - surefire-shadefire-3.0.0-M5.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M5

Yes, thank you Enrico. After a long time, we found a good reason to fix annoying issues which requires reworking some parts of the code. And also we were able to let the users use their implementation without asking us in Apache. We touched the milestone release where we could introduce the featur

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M5

A big "Thank You" goes to our user and contributor Jonathan Bell who is Assistant Professor at the George Mason University, his students, and our Apache colleague Enrico Olivelli. Of course a big "Thank You" goes to our Apache Maven team. Along we speeded up the plugin with short startup and teard

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M5

Hi Herve, We can fork the discussion about this problem apart in the Slack. Thx for finding this. T On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 9:35 PM Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > +1 > > near full reproducibility of reference artifacts with JDK 8 on Windows: 48 > artifacts are ok, just 2 still have issues: > - surefi

Re: Suggestion: announce Maven 3.0.x is EOL

On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 04:06, Robert Scholte wrote: > To me these are 2 different things. > Yes, we are going to require Maven 3.1 for our plugins (and because of API > changes we need to be explicit about this), but that doesn't mean that > Maven 3.0.x itself is end of life. > > Depending on how

[GitHub] [maven-site] suztomo commented on a change in pull request #176: [MNGSITE-415] say Maven 3.0.x is EOL

suztomo commented on a change in pull request #176: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/176#discussion_r439793731 ## File path: content/markdown/docs/history.md.vm ## @@ -93,6 +93,22 @@ Date format is: -MM-DD #release( "2013-10-04" "3.1.1" "announce/201310.mbox