Re: [DISCUSS] Maven 3.8.x and 3.9.x

Am 2021-12-17 um 17:29 schrieb Guillaume Nodet: Le ven. 17 déc. 2021 à 14:25, Michael Osipov a écrit : Am 2021-12-13 um 11:39 schrieb Guillaume Nodet: In order to progress on a few issues, I'd like to discuss two points. * merge https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/628 into the 3.8.x bra

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven 3.8.x and 3.9.x

Le ven. 17 déc. 2021 à 14:25, Michael Osipov a écrit : > Am 2021-12-13 um 11:39 schrieb Guillaume Nodet: > > In order to progress on a few issues, I'd like to discuss two points. > >* merge https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/628 into the 3.8.x > branch > > and release 3.8.5 asap. This is a

[ANN] Apache Maven Doxia Sitetools 1.11.1 released

The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven Doxia Sitetools, version 1.11.1 Doxia Sitetools is an extension of base Doxia component that generates either HTML sites, consisting of decoration and content that was generated by Doxia, or documents like RTF or PDF.

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Doxia Sitetools version 1.11.1

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1: Michael Osipov, Hervé Boutemy, Sylwester Lachiewicz, Tamás Cservenák PMC quorum: reached I will promote the artifacts to the central repo, the source release ZIP file and add this release the board report. --

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven 3.8.x and 3.9.x

Am 2021-12-13 um 11:39 schrieb Guillaume Nodet: In order to progress on a few issues, I'd like to discuss two points. * merge https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/628 into the 3.8.x branch and release 3.8.5 asap. This is a long-standing issue which had a couple of trial fixes over the past mo

Re: Supported versions policy - Maven Plugins

Hi, Think we already discussed it partially and said we were in a bad state because only 3.x is supported/worked but no final release is available and that 2.x would be best effort only (not even any guarantee about CVE fixes until somebody does the job like last time). So 3.0.0 is required, M6 is

[GitHub] [maven-artifact-transfer] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request #55: Bump apiMaven.version from 3.0 to 3.8.4

dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request #55: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-artifact-transfer/pull/55 Bumps `apiMaven.version` from 3.0 to 3.8.4. Updates `maven-core` from 3.0 to 3.8.4 Commits https://github.com/apache/maven/commit/9b656c72d54e5bacbed989b64718c159fe3

[GitHub] [maven-mvnd] olamy commented on pull request #539: Do not cut sha256 in release workflow

olamy commented on pull request #539: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-mvnd/pull/539#issuecomment-996680865 > > > > Let me check. > > > > > > > > > I cannot :/ after the repo moved to ASF. > > > > > > what sort of karma do you need? > > commitership ? I suppo

[GitHub] [maven-mvnd] gnodet commented on pull request #539: Do not cut sha256 in release workflow

gnodet commented on pull request #539: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-mvnd/pull/539#issuecomment-996679641 > > > Let me check. > > > > > > I cannot :/ after the repo moved to ASF. > > what sort of karma do you need? commitership ? I suppose Peter lost his write

Re: Using of Travis

Hi, +1 for getting rid of travis... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 17.12.21 08:51, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: Hi, As the primary CI environment we use Jenkins. Now also using GH Actions ... I think that those both are enough. Some projects contain scripts for Travis, like surefire. Do

[GitHub] [maven-mvnd] olamy commented on pull request #539: Do not cut sha256 in release workflow

olamy commented on pull request #539: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-mvnd/pull/539#issuecomment-996674704 > > Let me check. > > I cannot :/ after the repo moved to ASF. what sort of karma do you need? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To resp

Supported versions policy - Maven Plugins

Hi, On example of the Surefire project I would build some policy / documentation / information about which versions are supported and what for. It can be generally for all maintenanced Maven Plugins by AFS. = First topic what version of plugin should be supported, in the Surefire I see opene

[GitHub] [maven-mvnd] ppalaga commented on pull request #539: Do not cut sha256 in release workflow

ppalaga commented on pull request #539: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-mvnd/pull/539#issuecomment-996647121 > Let me check. I cannot :/ after the repo moved to ASF. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven 3.8.x and 3.9.x

There are some open/ongoing issues in there still, some of yours... so maybe create a 3.8.5 version and start tossing JIRAs onto it? https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MNG%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.8.x-candidate T On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:13 PM Guillaume Nodet wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven 3.8.x and 3.9.x

I've merged https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/627 in *maven-3.8.x* branch (and related https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/628) for master. Is there anything before we can cut a 3.8.5 release ? If not, I can derive a *maven-3.9.x* branch from the *maven-3.8.x* asap and start merging #622 and #6

[GitHub] [maven-mvnd] gnodet commented on pull request #538: Fastclean extension

gnodet commented on pull request #538: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-mvnd/pull/538#issuecomment-996632492 > Wow! You... are... quick!! :) Thank you so much for taking the time to test out the idea. > > So I gave it a shot and strangely, despite you spinning up a new thread, t

[GitHub] [maven-mvnd] gnodet closed pull request #538: Fastclean extension

gnodet closed pull request #538: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-mvnd/pull/538 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..

Re: [DISCUSS] Move maven caching to an external repository

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

[GitHub] [maven-mvnd] gnodet commented on issue #540: Can I specify the MVN version?

gnodet commented on issue #540: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-mvnd/issues/540#issuecomment-996623423 No, that's not doable unfortunately as the code is too dependant on maven's internals. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, pleas

[GitHub] [maven-mvnd] gnodet closed issue #540: Can I specify the MVN version?

gnodet closed issue #540: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-mvnd/issues/540 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mav

Re: [DISCUSS] Move maven caching to an external repository

I've tried various things without any good results. Given there's not much history to preserve here, I'd go ahead and just create a new repo with the current contents of the branch. Any objections? Le dim. 12 déc. 2021 à 15:43, Jeff Jensen a écrit : > I've split git repos before and using filter

Re: Using of Travis

+1 to drop Am Fr., 17. Dez. 2021 um 10:24 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1 to drop > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github

[GitHub] [maven-mvnd] feng-sword commented on issue #540: Can I specify the MVN version?

feng-sword commented on issue #540: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-mvnd/issues/540#issuecomment-996607366 I find this project a moment ago， it‘s interesting,Can I specify the MVN version?😃 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, plea

[GitHub] [maven-mvnd] feng-sword opened a new issue #540: Can I specify the MVN version?

feng-sword opened a new issue #540: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-mvnd/issues/540 Can I specify the MVN version? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

Re: Using of Travis

+1 to drop Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: Using of Travis

+1 to get rid of travis On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 08:52, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > Hi, > > As the primary CI environment we use Jenkins. > Now also using GH Actions ... > I think that those both are enough. > > Some projects contain scripts for Travis, like surefire. > > Do we want to still use

[GitHub] [maven-mvnd] huxudong commented on issue #537: Does not support the spring-boot-maven-plugin

huxudong commented on issue #537: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-mvnd/issues/537#issuecomment-996557168 > Could you please point us to a minimal reproducer project? I created a new springboot project and found no problem. Thank you -- This is an automated message from the Apa

[GitHub] [maven-mvnd] huxudong closed issue #537: Does not support the spring-boot-maven-plugin

huxudong closed issue #537: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-mvnd/issues/537 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@m

Re: Using of Travis

Howdy, I think (of course) no. 2 is enough, also Travis went to paid service? So +1 to root out Travis from all ASF Maven reposes. HTH T On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 8:52 AM Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > Hi, > > As the primary CI environment we use Jenkins. > Now also using GH Actions ... > I thin