+1
T
On Sat, Mar 5, 2022 at 5:47 PM Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 27 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922&version=12351105
>
> There are still hundreds of issues left in JIRA:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
+1
on the reproducible builds front, there are some strange package-info.class
files appearing in some jars that are not available in the reference build:
what is it? why?
Regards,
Hervé
Le samedi 5 mars 2022, 17:47:12 CET Michael Osipov a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 27 issues:
> https://iss
Hi Christian!
I am happy to help where I can.
In case you made me an admin, I would be happy to tune the settings for
projects as needed and/or switch more projects to Matomo once it is
established well.
- Ben
On Sun, 6 Mar 2022, 20:45 Christian Grobmeier, wrote:
> Hi Olivier,
>
> we (eith
Hi Olivier,
we (either me or Martijn) will set up a project.
Glad to see Maven will do this.
Or Benjamin, if he wants to give us a helping hand :-) In this case i gladly
add you as an admin in Matomo there
Kind regards,
Christian
--
The Apache Software Foundation
V.P., Data Privacy
On Sun,
Exactly for this question I CC'd Martijn 😅. You accidentally clicked on
"reply" instead of "reply all", I guess...
You can also find us in #privacy-matomo in our Slack instance.
I'm not sure how much infra is involved at this point. Martijn and
Christian can answer these questions.
On Sun, 6 Ma
+1
On Sat, Mar 5, 2022, 17:47 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 27 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922&version=12351105
>
> There are still hundreds of issues left in JIRA:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MN
Hi
looks good.
how do we have access to manage tracking id etc?
On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 at 22:41, Benjamin Marwell wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> The ASF now runs a public Matomo instance [1].
> They are open for more projects now.
>
> If it is okay with you, we could add a tracking code to our site.xml f
+1 (none-binding)
Tested with a large multi modules build running a number of times to verify
concurrency issues
Many thanks to the Maven team
-D
On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 12:38 AM Michael Osipov wrote:
> Yes, have a look at MNG-7335 and MNG-7156
>
> Am 2022-03-06 um 05:30 schrieb Dan Tran:
> >
Yes, have a look at MNG-7335 and MNG-7156
Am 2022-03-06 um 05:30 schrieb Dan Tran:
Hello
In maven 3.8.4, Maven team reverted a number of fixes (which caused
regressions) related to concurrency issues. does 3.8.5 add back the fixes?
The release notes mention a couple of parallel build related
