Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-beta-4

2024-08-30 Thread Delany
+1 Delany On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 at 15:43, Tamás Cservenák wrote: > Howdy, > > We solved 56 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922&version=12354939 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=proj

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-beta-4

2024-08-30 Thread Mateusz Gajewski
+1 nb works like a charm with Trino (no changes needed) On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 19:34 Basil Crow wrote: > +1 > > This release is working well with Jenkins core and plugin builds. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@m

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-beta-4

2024-08-30 Thread Basil Crow
+1 This release is working well with Jenkins core and plugin builds. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [HEADS UP] Maven 4.0.0-beta-4 is around the corner

2024-08-30 Thread Basil Crow
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 2:16 AM Tamás Cservenák wrote: > Just take a peek and look at the very first Jenkins build built with mvn4 :) > https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1693 > > It seems it is gonna be beta-4 that will cope with Jenkins build after all. Many thanks! I have tested Jenkins core

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-beta-4

2024-08-30 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Howdy, We solved 56 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922&version=12354939 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MNG%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved Staging repo: https://repos

Re: [HEADS UP] Maven 4.0.0-beta-4 is around the corner

2024-08-30 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Howdy, Just take a peek and look at the very first Jenkins build built with mvn4 :) https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1693 It seems it is gonna be beta-4 that will cope with Jenkins build after all. Thanks T On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 10:46 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote: > > I just read it, thank y