+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/10/01 15:38:25 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 25 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12354041
>
> There is one issue left in JIRA:
> h
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
for easy Reproducible Builds check command, see instructions at the end of
section
https://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-project-release-procedure.html#call-the-vote
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/09/28 18:09:00 Michael
+1
Reproducible Build fully ok this time: reference build done with JDK 8 on
Windows
thank you Michael
Hervé
On 2024/09/28 17:27:19 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317529&version=12355065
>
> There are s
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/09/26 09:34:28 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317926&version=12355133
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
+1
Reproducible Build not fully ok: reference build done on Windows with JDK 11
issue found in CycloneDX SBOM, that list wrong hashes of plexus-utils 4.0.2
(b3f486796c6bc4fcb625a083b0e4698ca35b0f19 instead of
9526a9548b302572f23337fcc217fb4cc713b9c3 from Maven Central)
cleaning local cache, reb
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is perfect for Linux distributions, that do their own
distro-specific packages (.rpm, .deb, .apk, ...) from the upstream project by
adding some patches and some packaging instructions
=> having a general way to inject its own choice of timestamp through a
standardized environme
> So just to be clear, what is the really the end goal of enabling it by
> default? I know the advantages and benefits, but what would be the goal of
> having this opt-out instead of having it opt-in?
if you just build without adding any configuration nor any special (or old)
plugin, you'll get R
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/09/24 13:08:47 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> This issue fixes a lingering issue in the whole 3.2.x lineage, that
> resulted in "bad passphrase" on Windows OS with GPG signer.
>
> We solved 3 issues
> Or is the idea to have a *fixed* *default* timestamp for all builds?
yes, this is the idea: there is no other option I can imagine to get a
reproducible zip entries timestamp, whatever the precise value of the timestamp
it is
If anybody has any other algorithm idea (that supports wide reality
+1
great work, thank you Slawek
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/09/22 21:48:05 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 36 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317122&version=12351178
>
> Ther
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference binaries done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/09/11 20:08:54 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317523&version=12354926
>
> There are still some issues in J
+1
thanks for the quick respin
this time, Reproducible Build fully ok: reference build done on *nix with JDK 21
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/09/11 07:27:32 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> respin #1 changes the staging repository, as my local repository
> contained some rogue Maven binaries (as r
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 22 on *nix
notice that using a LTS JDK for releases would be a good practice for easier
future rebuilds
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/08/20 21:49:24 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 16 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/sec
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/08/18 18:52:01 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> NOTE: Read the details on this release here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Towards+Doxia+2.0.0+Stack
>
> we solved 2 issues:
> http
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/08/18 19:12:34 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> NOTE: Read the details on this release here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Towards+Doxia+2.0.0+Stack
>
> we solved 3 issues:
> http
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/08/18 18:40:11 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> NOTE: Read the details on this release here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Towards+Doxia+2.0.0+Stack
>
> we solved 3 issues:
> http
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
side note: when rebuilt with "-DskipTests",
maven-checkstyle-plugin-3.5.0-source-release.zip output misses 2 files
available in reference =
maven-checkstyle-plugin-3.5.0/src/test/resources/plugin-configs/target/test-harness/c
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/08/19 15:34:43 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> NOTE: Read the details on this release here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Towards+Doxia+2.0.0+Stack
>
> we solved 4 issues:
> http
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/08/18 19:00:54 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> NOTE: Read the details on this release here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Towards+Doxia+2.0.0+Stack
>
> we solved 4 issues:
> http
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: build done with JDK 21 and Maven 4.0.0-beta-3 on
everything but maven-compiler-plugin where Maven 3 was used
this explains why maven-compiler-plugin documentation is not broken :)
notice that build poms *-build.pom were not checked, I'll need to improve
artifact:compar
near all documentations are broken, in general missing reports menu, half using
wrong skin
I don't know the root cause, but it's strange
if we do the release, I'd ask to not replace the current documentation with
these beta ones: keeping versioned in -archive is ok
I hope maintenance of these
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done on Windows with JDK 8
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/06/02 15:20:38 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 4 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317522&version=12353019
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done on Windows with JDK 8
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/06/02 14:48:44 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 5 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317223&version=12353877
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done on Windows with JDK 8
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/06/01 19:57:44 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 5 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12353160
>
> There are no issues left in JIRA:
> h
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done on Windows with JDK 8
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/06/01 20:50:56 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317527&version=12354463
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
notice that it is ok when rebuilding from source-release.zip, but rebuilding
from Git gave me different source-release.zip because I'm not building from
Windows
If someone can rebuild from Git on a Windows host and confirm the
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/04/29 21:51:30 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 4 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12354488
>
> There are no more issues left in J
it's part of the wider Maven Ecosystem Cleanup plan
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+Ecosystem+Cleanup
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/04/30 00:01:57 Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> I can see plenty of PRs with maven-compat removal.
> Maybe this could be explained and so more people co
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows with umask
022 (parent POM not upgraded)
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/04/26 14:51:35 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=1235409
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/04/26 10:38:51 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> We solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317228&version=12354128
>
> There are still a couple of issue
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/04/26 12:21:16 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Note: This is the last alpha release, next one will be beta-1. This version
> is to be picked up by Maven 4 beta-1. It contains 2 important bug fixes a
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/04/26 10:38:49 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> We solved 5 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317524&version=12353548
>
> There are still a couple of issue
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/04/26 11:00:32 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Note: Maven Resolver 1.x lineage is in "bugfix only" maintenance mode.
>
> This Resolver 1.9.20 release is a bugfix release: A behaviour change
> intro
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows and umask 022
(parent POM not upgraded)
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/04/23 19:03:06 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 12 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320&version=12354412
>
> T
here is my +1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/04/20 15:54:37 Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317921&version=12354342&styleName=Text
>
> Staging repo:
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on *nix
FTR: I'm quite happy this release benefits from 2 improvements injected into
latest parent POM:
1. with latest maven-source-plugin, umask does not impact he result any more
2. with latest plugin-tools, we have an automatic plugin
here is my +1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 11 on *nix umask 002
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/29 07:04:07 Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 4 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324322&version=12353681&styleName=Text
>
> Staging re
here is my +1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 11 on *nix, umask 002
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/30 02:11:12 Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317820&version=12354176&styleName=Text
>
> Staging r
here is my +1
Reproducible build ok: reference done with JDK 11 on *nix and umask 002
@Tamas this umask is the cause of your issue. In the future, with MSOURCES-137,
we will be insensitive, which will avoid this little annoying precision
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/30 01:55:10 Hervé Boutemy wr
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix with umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/29 12:20:16 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Note: This is an eighth (alpha-4 and alpha-9 was scrubbed) preview release
> of Resolver 2.0.0, that would allow any downstream consumers
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 11 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/27 06:44:40 Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin version 3.6.1
> We solved 3 issues (well that's what Jira says):
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNo
https://github.com/apache/maven-source-plugin/pull/24 does not seem to get any
positive traction: be it
MSOURCE-140 and MSOURCE-141 are assigned to 3.3.1 release but nobody wants to
work with me on it to solve something: it seems they are not a real problem
I won't hold the 3.3.1 release foreve
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 21 on *nix and umask=022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/24 22:36:30 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12353577
>
> There are still a couple o
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 21 on *nix and umask=022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/23 22:06:12 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Note: this is a bugfix release for
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MGPG-113
>
> We solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/sec
I use purge-local-repository sometimes, for some very specific tests
like copy* and unpack* are useful tools in a few builds
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/21 18:43:24 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Oliver: all, really?
> I wonder what you used for goals like "purge-local-repository",
> "resolv
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix with umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/15 08:25:07 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Note: this is a bugfix release for
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MGPG-112
>
> We solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/j
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix with umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/15 07:58:49 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317220&version=12354406
>
> There are still a c
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 21 on *nix and umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/15 07:36:15 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 10 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317225&version=12354079
>
> There are still a couple
using 4.x scheme looks simple and working: ok there is an exception with site,
as there are always exceptions
what is important is system prerequisites history: remember for JDK
requirement? same for Maven version requirement
just need to finish work on MPLUGIN-511 and we'll get the documentatio
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Win umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/09 20:38:43 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 7 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320&version=12354091
>
> There are still a couple of iss
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/08 09:42:15 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> We solved 13 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317521&version=12354382
>
> There are still a couple
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/07 18:27:47 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 25 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317220&version=12353243
>
> There are still a coup
Maven 4 is now stable enough: we need to try
Reproducible Builds is there to help check more aspects (if people check output)
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/06 08:45:55 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> I'm not sure if we should build release version with Maven 4
>
> sob., 2 mar 2024 o 10:48 Guillaume No
On 2024/03/03 08:56:59 Herve Boutemy wrote:
> +1
>
> Reproducible Builds near fully ok: reference builds done with Maven 4, JDK 21
> and umask 022 on *nix
>
> check command: mvn -Papache-release clean -Dgpg.skip verify artifact:compare
> -Dreference.repo=https://repositor
+1
Reproducible Builds near fully ok: reference builds done with Maven 4, JDK 21
and umask 022 on *nix
check command: mvn -Papache-release clean -Dgpg.skip verify artifact:compare
-Dreference.repo=https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging
only issue is with maven-remote-resour
+1
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/02/28 07:30:07 Benjamin Marwell wrote:
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
> of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require J
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done on *nix with JDK 21 and umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/01/29 19:37:20 Benjamin Marwell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12321432&version=12349496
>
> There are still two is
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows with umask
022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/01/07 19:33:04 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMPORTANT: This require the following staging repositories:
>
> * Maven Doxia 2.0.0-M9
>
> we solved 1 issue:
> https://issues.apache.or
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows with umask
022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/01/07 12:18:56 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 10 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317820&version=12353824
>
> There are still a c
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows with umask
022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/01/06 20:05:47 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 7 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927&version=12354100
>
> There are still a co
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows with umask
022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/01/06 20:22:46 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 12 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317230&version=12354052
>
> There are still a c
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done on *nix with JDK 21 and umask 022
see instructions to check RB yourself on a release:
https://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-project-release-procedure.html#call-the-vote
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/12/15 21:04:29 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done on *nix with JDK 11
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/11/27 02:12:14 Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to release the Apache Maven Build Cache Extension 1.1.0.
> We've fixed 8 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=1235247
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done on Widonws with JDK 8 and umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/11/18 09:23:43 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320&version=12353864
>
> There are still a coupl
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix with umask 022
checked with mvn -Papache-release,run-its clean -Dgpg.skip verify
artifact:compare
-Dreference.repo=https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/11/17 23:27:27 Tamás Cserven
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on WIndows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/11/17 21:54:18 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317821&version=12353875
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix with umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/23 06:11:22 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 4 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317224&version=12353735
>
> There are still a c
maven-core/default-bindings.html
On 2023/10/21 14:34:32 Herve Boutemy wrote:
> +1
>
> Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix with umask
> 022 and Maven 4.0.0-alpha-8 itself (yes...)
>
> a few remarks:
> - I'll add some updates to release notes lat
I just published the reference documentation built with Maven 3.9.5
Maven 4.0.0-alpha-8 breaks something in Maven Site plugin on site descriptor
download from repository...
On 2023/10/21 08:34:31 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looks like documentation site does not use parent site descrip
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix with umask 022
and Maven 4.0.0-alpha-8 itself (yes...)
a few remarks:
- I'll add some updates to release notes later
- during tests, I found that an active repository configured in my settings.xml
had been added to the published
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 11 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/20 18:44:06 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 9 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927&version=12353730
>
> There are still a couple of issues
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows with umask
022
For people interested in details, I had to use JDK 8 Temurin but not Zulu to be
able to reproduce the CycloneDX SBOM (because of the supported hasing
algorithms difference between the 2 distributions)
Regards
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows with umask
022
For people interested in details, I had to use JDK 8 Temurin but not Zulu to be
able to reproduce the CycloneDX SBOM (because of the supported hasing
algorithms difference between the 2 distributions)
Regards
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows with umask
022
For people interested in details, I had to use JDK 8 Temurin but not Zulu to be
able to reproduce the CycloneDX SBOM (because of the supported hasing
algorithms difference between the 2 distributions)
Regards
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/15 07:54:25 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 6 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317820&version=12353337
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/13 22:18:52 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMPORTANT: This require the following staging repositories:
>
> * Doxia 2.0.0-M8
> * Maven Reporting API 4.0.0-M8
> * Doxia Sitetools 2.0.0-M13
> * Maven
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/13 20:58:45 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMPORTANT: This require the following staging repositories:
>
> * Doxia 2.0.0-M8
> * Maven Reporting API 4.0.0-M8
> * Doxia Sitetools 2.0.0-M13
> * Maven
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/13 20:39:58 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMPORTANT: This require the following staging repositories:
>
> * Doxia 2.0.0-M8
> * Maven Reporting API 4.0.0-M8
> * Doxia Sitetools 2.0.0-M13
>
> we so
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/13 20:10:42 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320&version=12353711
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/13 19:43:17 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMPORTANT: This require the following staging repositories:
>
> * Doxia 2.0.0-M12
>
> we solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Release
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/13 19:32:40 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317230&version=12353657
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/08 14:15:28 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 4 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317926&version=12353679
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
> I believe the fix is the same as before: I should rebuild from the tag,
> > > after I fixed my local repository, as source bundles we vote on are
> > > unchanged...
> > >
> > > T
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 9:14 AM Herve Boutemy
> >
thinking twice, I need to change to -1: this may impact users that expect to
use the group permissions to use Maven binaries
sorry
I don't know what tests you are doing with permissions on your environment, but
these tests leak releases :(
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/02 07:11:02 Herve Bo
+1
but Reproducible not fully ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix and
umask 022
apache-maven-3.9.5-bin.zip and .tar.gz suffer from weird umask (go-r) on wagon
jars:
$ diffoscope target/reference/org.apache.maven/apache-maven-3.9.5-bin.zip
apache-maven/target/apache-maven-3.9.5-bin.zip
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix with umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/09/08 11:11:03 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12320628&version=12348840
>
> There are still som
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix with umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/09/07 17:39:48 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317520&version=12353576
>
> There are still a c
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix with umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/08/19 10:59:50 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 7 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12353169
>
> There are still a c
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix with umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/08/19 16:54:40 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 9 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317520&version=12353101
>
> There are still a c
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix with umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/08/04 12:45:40 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Context: This release focuses on "third party integrations" and provides a
> migration path for those who rely on deprecated `ServiceLocat
thanks for re-doing the release
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix
No bad content from local repository environment went in this time :)
Lesson learned: when rebuilding a release, never "mvn install"
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/07/31 10:29:11 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
notice that you don't need to go to 3.9.5: rebuilding 3.9.4 from a clean local
repository and Git checkout from tag with `mvn -Papache-release deploy` will do
the job that has to be re-done
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/07/29 08:47:48 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Am cancelling the vote due Herve -1
>
>
-1
Reproducible Build not ok: the binary release ships with a
lib/maven-resolver-api-1.9.14.jar
that is not the same as the reference one published on Maven Central
(surprisingly, other resolver jar are ok...)
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/07/26 10:08:53 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> We solve
+1
Reproducible Builds: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
maven-fluido-skin-2.0.0-M7.jar has different META-INF/LICENSE and META-INF/
NOTICE
it seems there is a conflict between files generated by remote-resources on
org.apache:apache-jar-resource-bundle:1.4 (which seem to be the output
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/07/07 19:16:12 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMPORTANT: Requires Doxia Sitetools 2.0.0-M11, Maven Reporting API
> 4.0.0-M7, Maven Reporting Impl 4.0.0-M9, Maven Reporting Exec 2.0.0-M9
> vote/stagin
+1
Reproducible Build ok: referenec build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/07/07 15:52:08 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMPORTANT: Requires Doxia Sitetools 2.0.0-M11, Maven Reporting API
> 4.0.0-M7, Maven Reporting Impl 4.0.0-M9 vote/staging repo!
>
> we solved 3 issues:
+1
Reproducible Build ok: referenec build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/07/07 15:38:03 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMPORTANT: Requires Doxia Sitetools 2.0.0-M11, Maven Reporting API
> 4.0.0-M7 vote/staging repo!
>
> we solved 5 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/07/07 07:26:02 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320&version=12353373
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/07/06 14:46:04 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12353372
>
> There are no issues left in JIRA:
>
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/07/06 15:09:10 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 8 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317926&version=12353397
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
1 - 100 of 301 matches
Mail list logo
