Re: [Q] Setting a property so that it's visible from another plug in

2004-04-22 Thread Stephen McConnell
Brett Porter wrote: Great - thanks Stephen. IIRC I fixed the manifest problems for the next release of the JAR plugin (or at least assigned the issue to myself to do by then :) That's terrific news. Let me know if you want any additional help/feedback on this one. Cheers, Stephen. -- |---

Re: [Q] Setting a property so that it's visible from another plug in

2004-04-22 Thread Stephen McConnell
Brett Porter wrote: I was speaking to some Atlassian folk last night and they are also on beta-10, as is Avalon. I wonder how many others have decided to stick with it? Just for reference - Avalon builds have been updated to work with RC2. Some tweaking was needed on the site generation and some

Re: [jira] Commented: (MPJAR-7) Specification-Version and Implementation-Vendor-Id not being set

2004-04-16 Thread Stephen McConnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Stephen McConnell Created: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:51 AM Body: Under Maven RC2 the jar plugin manifest entries have been changed in such a way that can result in runtime failure based on the

Re: cvs commit: maven-components/maven-project/src/java/org/apache/maven/artifact AbstractArtifact.java Artifact.java Artifactory.java DefaultArtifactFactory.java DefaultArtifactory.java GenericArtifact.java

2003-12-26 Thread Stephen McConnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: /** @see Artifact#isSnapshot */ public boolean isSnapshot() { return getDependency().getArtifact().indexOf( "SNAPSHOT" ) > 0; } Is this really indexof or endsWith ? Stephen. -- Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |

Re: [VOTE] Incubate Apache Repo

2003-11-24 Thread Stephen McConnell
Adam R. B. Jack wrote: Noel wrote: +1 if you mean to incubate a particular project, since it seems that you have a set of codebases and a community to start. However, unless it is willing to be more inclusive of other related projects, I don't think that it should be permitted to refer to it

Re: [VOTE] Make groupId mandatory for POM version 4?

2003-11-13 Thread Stephen McConnell
Vincent Massol wrote: Hi, I'd like to make a mandatory element in POM version 4. What do you think? The reason is that I don't what the default can be if it's not specified and if we want to have plugins that start using the id/groupId/type elements, there must be a groupId defined. Here's my

Re: maven-new

2003-11-09 Thread Stephen McConnell
Jason van Zyl wrote: On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 03:19, Stephen McConnell wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 18:54, Stephen McConnell wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I like to work in a team. +1 Steve, you are an oracle of

Re: maven-new

2003-11-09 Thread Stephen McConnell
Jason van Zyl wrote: On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 18:54, Stephen McConnell wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I like to work in a team. +1 Steve, you are an oracle of sage advice. Thank you .. Just between you and I .. It's good to get positive feedback from time to time! Ho

Re: [Possible Incubation] Apache Repo

2003-11-09 Thread Stephen McConnell
Jason van Zyl wrote: On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 01:08, Stephen McConnell wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 00:35, Stephen McConnell wrote: Jason: I must confess that I am intrigued by your approach to collaboration! That's because you're a

Re: maven-new

2003-11-08 Thread Stephen McConnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I like to work in a team. +1 -- Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: maven-new

2003-11-07 Thread Stephen McConnell
Jason van Zyl wrote: On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 11:47, Steve Garcia wrote: Curious, what was the problem with maven-new? Is there not enough support for it? Or are the main features going to be added to the existing Maven (therefore obviating the need for maven-new?) It's been completely re

Re: Board report due next week.

2003-10-15 Thread Stephen McConnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone have anything to add to this: I do - but it's not politically correct. Stephen. Maven 1.0 RC1 [2] was released 30 September. This was another quiet release mostly fixing problems [3] with plugins and adding functionality that allows the automated downl

Re: Plugin download usage

2003-09-30 Thread Stephen McConnell
Jason van Zyl wrote: On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 09:50, Nathan Coast wrote: what's the stucture for plugins in a remote repository? /plugins/-version.jar Yes, the plugins are now another artifact type. So you might have: foo bar-plugin plugin 1.0 Goot stuff! Just for reference - if I

Re: RC1

2003-09-26 Thread Stephen McConnell
http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Stephen McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 26/09/2003 04:21:02 PM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stephen McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 26/09/2003 02:47:27 PM: Dion: I know this is really wimpy, but I ha

Re: RC1

2003-09-25 Thread Stephen McConnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stephen McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 26/09/2003 02:47:27 PM: Dion: I know this is really wimpy, but I have a beta-10 release running on my machine which is the release that is documeted under the respective Avalon products. I would prefer to maint

Re: RC1

2003-09-25 Thread Stephen McConnell
heers, Steve. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stephen McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 26/09/2003 02:17:34 PM: Jason: Just a point of confirmation - Avalon have two Maven plugins, one dealing with automated generation of component meta-info and the second supporting simulated component

Re: RC1

2003-09-25 Thread Stephen McConnell
--Original Message----- From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 26 September 2003 2:18 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: RC1 Jason: Just a point of confirmation - Avalon have two Maven plugins, one dealing with automated generation of component meta-info and

Re: RC1

2003-09-25 Thread Stephen McConnell
Jason: Just a point of confirmation - Avalon have two Maven plugins, one dealing with automated generation of component meta-info and the second supporting simulated component deployment. Currently these plugins are located in the Avalon CVS and binary downloads are maintained on the Apache mir

[MAVEN] snapshot bug

2003-09-16 Thread Stephen McConnell
Alex Karasulu wrote: You called it once again thanks man! I feel like a moron. Hey - don't feel like a moron. First time this happened to me I spend a day stuffing around with system traces, rebuilding, etc. Based on that process the actual error reporting is rather reliable which is why I

Re: [offtopic] Re: Core plugins?

2003-09-13 Thread Stephen McConnell
Norbert Pabi¶ wrote: For a person who wants to choose a container it is important to see documentation that allows to choose the software, that suits its needs or just to comprehend new technology and its ideas. http://avalon.apache.org/sandbox/merlin -- Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[EMAIL P

Re: [jira] Created: (MAVEN-616) [Upload Request] excalibur-sourceresolve1.0.1

2003-07-26 Thread Stephen McConnell
Done. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-616 Here is an overview of the issue: -

Re: XDoclet tags errors in javadoc report

2003-06-13 Thread Stephen McConnell
Its not documeted by you can handle this by declaring you -tag statements under the "maven.javadoc.additionalparam" property. Cheers, Steve. Jürgen Heidak wrote: Hi We're using xdoclet to generate all EJB interfaces (Home, Remote, Local). When running javadoc:report I get a warning (e.g. @ejb

Re: Sun JARs

2003-06-10 Thread Stephen McConnell
Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, I have updated the sun-licensing-journey.xml file in the xdocs/ directory. I have started an initial list of JARs that we would like permission to scrape off their sites. If anyone can add to this list that would be appreciated. JNLP (WebStart) http://java.sun.com/p

Re: Private goals?

2003-03-19 Thread Stephen McConnell
Kurt Schrader wrote: Desired behavior is for goals with no description to not show up when 'maven -g' is invoked. That's what I wanted to know! :--) -Kurt On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Stephen McConnell wrote: Wht aspect of this is a bug? A shot answer is all I need. [EMAIL P

Re: Private goals?

2003-03-19 Thread Stephen McConnell
Wht aspect of this is a bug? A shot answer is all I need. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is definitely a bug. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog Work: http://www.multitask.com.au -"Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: