> I am trying to find about the best practices related to
> SNAPSHOT dependencies. More and more I think about them I
> find that some things are rather not clear and quite inconsistent.
>
> There is one misleading thing: We often find in POMs (maven,
> maven plugins do that):
>
>
> 3
> m
> > Now, if project B's pom is stored in the local repo with no
> properties
> > resolved (i.e. the pom file is not the interpolated
> version) then project
> > A needs to have definitions for these properties. This would not be
> > possible unless the properties files are also made
> availabl
I have a related question to SNAPSHOTs, now that we have a thread on this.
I notice that SNAPSHOT jar file names substitute the version for the word
SNAPSHOT. How does this behavior work for projects that have multiple
branches?
Our Platform project at work has many branches to it, there is a v1
Ryan I think that a great point. When you state one has a dependency on a
branch of a project, as opposed to a stable release of a project, then you
might encounter times that building your code against a snapshot from that
branch might break your build. That is the reason why following a branch
Great change. I agree with you that the older format was much easier to
read and navigate.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 7:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: cvs commit:
> maven-plugins/xdoc/src/plugin
I thought that the POM, being an "immutable" entity (once instantiated) and
one with a well known layout, should be safe to use as a reference in other
contexts. When would a plugin script ever be executed without having a POM
pushed to it?
I guess it can happen but I don't know when.
-Origi
http://maven.apache.org
Wow, a few CSS stylistic changes and Maven looks much better than before!
One thing I found weird is the upper Maven banner - it says the "Apache
Maven Project" and even gives a link "http://maven.apache.org"; yet it's
anchor points to "http://www.apache.org";. I think
> On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 11:33, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > I'm moving along with the maven-project component and I
> have arbitrary
> > levels of inheritance working for properties and the model.
> >
> > Now I'm starting to look at the property interpolation
> mechanism and I
> >
I believe they copy over all of the maven jar dependencies to your local
repository (there are over 10). I presume this is so you don't have to wait
several minutes to attain a goal the first time you use Maven because those
jars are used by so many plugins.
I don't think they are especially us
Curious, what was the problem with maven-new? Is there not enough support
for it? Or are the main features going to be added to the existing Maven
(therefore obviating the need for maven-new?)
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November
Just to clarify, where are the non-core plugins being moved to? Are they no
longer going to be part of the maven src tree?
Thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 1:09 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Moving
Thanks for the response Brett, I thought at first when nobody responded that
my request was not well received. :)
I was browsing through the bugs and there are some that I can definitely
help with. Is the procedure just to attach the patch to the bug defect?
I'm on the mailing list now so I'll
I would anticipate that Maven should permit inheritance of the three files
below (project.xml, project.properties, maven.xml), and in this case there
is true inheritance...all properties defined by the child override the
parent definition.
But I would suggest it is the aggregete of the propertie
Hello there - I've been using Maven on and off for the last year, and I've
recently downloaded the source and been playing around with it on my local
machine. Thus far I have been impressed with Maven, and I'm really excited
about where it can go in the future.
Based on what I've seen, I am inter
14 matches
Mail list logo
