[ANN] Surefire 2.6 Released

2010-08-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of Surefire, version 2.6 This release includes the maven-surefire-plugin, which executes the unit tests of an application, the maven-surefire-report-plugin, which parses surefire/failsafe test results and renders them to DOXIA creating the web

Re: [ANN] Surefire 2.6 Released

2010-08-16 Thread sebb
Why has SUREFIRE-536 still not been fixed? It was originally reported against 2.4.3 On 16 August 2010 15:19, Stephen Connolly steph...@apache.org wrote: The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of Surefire, version 2.6 This release includes the maven-surefire-plugin, which executes

Re: [ANN] Surefire 2.6 Released

2010-08-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
Does the issue have a patch? Does the patch include integration tests that cover positive and negative testing? Is the patch against the latest code base? Is the patch formatted using the Maven code style? Does the patch exclude formatting changes on lines not affected by the patch? If the

Re: [ANN] Surefire 2.6 Released

2010-08-16 Thread sebb
On 16 August 2010 16:00, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Does the issue have a patch? It does now. Many thanks to Stevo Slavic. Does the patch include integration tests that cover positive and negative testing? AFAIK. Is the patch against the latest code base?

Re: [ANN] Surefire 2.6 Released

2010-08-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 16 August 2010 23:15, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 August 2010 16:00, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Does the issue have a patch? It does now. Many thanks to Stevo Slavic. Does the patch include integration tests that cover positive and negative testing?

Re: [ANN] Surefire 2.6 Released

2010-08-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
patch applied r986189. On 16 August 2010 23:50, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 August 2010 23:15, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 August 2010 16:00, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Does the issue have a patch? It does now. Many