2007/4/25, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sorry, I don't quite understand this? Are you saying it's just
incompatible with what's in there already, or this now diverges from
compatibility with the current version?
Nope
I had incompatibility between my first descriptor proposition and my secon
Sorry, I don't quite understand this? Are you saying it's just
incompatible with what's in there already, or this now diverges from
compatibility with the current version?
I think it was the former, in which case you shouldn't need to do
anything - you can use the revision number to go back
Hi,
With the archetypeng stuff, i think i have reached
a point in which i need advice.
For what i can see, the current code seems useable.
I am currently refactoring the proposed descriptor.
This change will be incompatible with the current
proposition, which mimics and enchance the
actual beha
