Re: [Off Topic] Re: Code provenance checks for Plexus components

2009-02-28 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > Ok I understand. The problem is for commercial products based on Eclipse. I > forgot that.For plexus it's annoying but it mustn't be to difficult to > solve. The number of committers is limited and the major part is in the > maven's team. >

Re: [Off Topic] Re: Code provenance checks for Plexus components

2009-02-28 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Ok I understand. The problem is for commercial products based on Eclipse. I forgot that.For plexus it's annoying but it mustn't be to difficult to solve. The number of committers is limited and the major part is in the maven's team. good luck Arnaud On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Abel Muiño

Re: [Off Topic] Re: Code provenance checks for Plexus components

2009-02-28 Thread Rahul Thakur
IIRC, some of the sources are under ASL 2.0. I think I have seen some source headers with MIT and some with Common Public License. Rahul On 28/02/2009 4:18 p.m., Abel Muiño wrote: Arnaud HERITIER wrote: No it's not the case.I often find Apache processes heavy,, but if in eclipse you h

[Off Topic] Re: Code provenance checks for Plexus components

2009-02-28 Thread Abel Muiño
Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > > No it's not the case.I often find Apache processes heavy,, but if in > eclipse > you have to validate all dependencies I better understand why its quality > is > lower day after day. All teams are probably checking their dependencies > instead of writting tests. > I