We don't have everybody replies but here is the current result.
In favor to have ITs launched by default in the build :
Olivier, Vincent S,
In favor to have ITs launched on demand in the build :
Brian, Brett, Wendy, Barrie, Jason (told me on IRC), myself
Any others opinions ?
With our new
Hi Arnaud,
2008/8/13 Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We don't have everybody replies but here is the current result.
In favor to have ITs launched by default in the build :
Olivier, Vincent S,
In favor to have ITs launched on demand in the build :
Brian, Brett, Wendy, Barrie, Jason
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Vincent Siveton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Arnaud,
2008/8/13 Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We don't have everybody replies but here is the current result.
In favor to have ITs launched by default in the build :
Olivier, Vincent S,
In favor
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you want to have ITs activated by default in the plugin build ?
No.
Why ?
The default build should be fast, otherwise people are going to skip
2008/8/7 Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
You noticed that we changed in plugins the behavior of ITs.
We would like to have your advice :
Do you want to have ITs activated by default in the plugin build ?
I think we need to separate your question between core and plugins:
*
On 08/08/2008, at 9:55 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
2008/8/7 Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
You noticed that we changed in plugins the behavior of ITs.
We would like to have your advice :
Do you want to have ITs activated by default in the plugin build ?
I think we need to
I think the slowness will turn people towards continually wanting to skip
them rather than run them. It's an interesting question of what impression
it gives to the contributors - impressed by the testing, or annoyed by the
speed of the build?
Often contributors who try to work on the
I think the typical development pattern is where you code and unit
test and code and unit test, you maybe write an integration test or
two and run them on their own, and then before you commit you run all
the integration tests. The last part is just discipline, and as long
as we have CI
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you want to have ITs activated by default in the plugin build ?
No.
Why ?
The default build should be fast, otherwise people are going to skip
the tests entirely. Integration tests don't need to be run on every
Hi all,
You noticed that we changed in plugins the behavior of ITs.
We would like to have your advice :
Do you want to have ITs activated by default in the plugin build ?
Why ?
--
..
Arnaud HERITIER
Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 5:15 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] ITs launched by default in plugins builds ?
Hi all,
You noticed that we changed in plugins the behavior of ITs.
We would like to have your advice
2008/8/7 Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
You noticed that we changed in plugins the behavior of ITs.
We would like to have your advice :
Do you want to have ITs activated by default in the plugin build ?
+1 : yes they should be activated by default.
Why ?
First preference: disabled by default, but easily enabled.
Second preference: enabled by default, but with a separate property to
disable (so you can run UTs and skip ITs).
The purist in me wants to enable by default in the integration-test
phase, and just run up to test or package. But
13 matches
Mail list logo
