Hi,
The staging repository is here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant-
tasks-2.0.6/
The uber jar that people will want to try is here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant-
tasks-2.0.6/org/apache/maven/maven-ant-tasks/2.0.6/
Road map:
Hi,
Repost of the vote after fixing the issues with the uber JAR that was
produced. Hervé and I have tried them and they appear to work fine.
The staging repository is here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant-
tasks-2.0.6/
The uber jar that people will want to
+1
On 4/1/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The staging repository is here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant-
tasks-2.0.6/
The uber jar that people will want to try is here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant-
tasks-2.
+1
Andy
On 4/1/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The staging repository is here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant-
tasks-2.0.6/
The uber jar that people will want to try is here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant-
t
+1
--jason
On Apr 1, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
The staging repository is here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant-
tasks-2.0.6/
The uber jar that people will want to try is here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant
+1
On 4/2/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
--jason
On Apr 1, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The staging repository is here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant-
> tasks-2.0.6/
>
> The uber jar that people will want to try is he
+1
On 4/3/07, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 4/2/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Apr 1, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The staging repository is here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/mav
Ok, I'll release these tonight and document the stage copying utility.
Jason.
On 2 Apr 07, at 11:22 PM 2 Apr 07, John Tolentino wrote:
+1
On 4/3/07, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 4/2/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Apr 1, 2007, at 10:36
Was this ever done? I still see links to 2.0.4 versions of the tasks
on the download page.
--jason
On 4/3/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, I'll release these tonight and document the stage copying utility.
Jason.
On 2 Apr 07, at 11:22 PM 2 Apr 07, John Tolentino wrote:
> +1
On 5 Apr 07, at 2:11 PM 5 Apr 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
Was this ever done? I still see links to 2.0.4 versions of the tasks
on the download page.
If you didn't see an announcement it's not done.
--jason
On 4/3/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, I'll release these tonight an
-1
The uberjar does not work equivalently to the last release, as it
does not contain the lightweight http wagon. I've filed this as
MANTTASKS-64. I also noticed that the uberjar is larger than the
previous one, despite omitting some things - I wonder if something
was unnecessarily includ
On 8 Apr 07, at 11:39 PM 8 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote:
-1
You missed the window by a long shot but I haven't copied the staging
directory over, but please try and check things before the window
elapses.
I left to others to check and there are no tests and the sample is
hardwired to t
On 09/04/2007, at 3:01 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 8 Apr 07, at 11:39 PM 8 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote:
-1
You missed the window by a long shot but I haven't copied the
staging directory over, but please try and check things before the
window elapses.
I tried, but I've been swamped a
On 9 Apr 07, at 1:06 AM 9 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 09/04/2007, at 3:01 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 8 Apr 07, at 11:39 PM 8 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote:
-1
You missed the window by a long shot but I haven't copied the
staging directory over, but please try and check things before
On 09/04/2007, at 3:15 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I do. Myself, John T, and John C.
/me wonders where his mail client stashed the other ones. Sorry John C!
I can't see the problem right off as I have the build previous the
stage, and what I just built now and they container all the wagon
+1
Stéphane
On 4/1/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The staging repository is here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant-
tasks-2.0.6/
The uber jar that people will want to try is here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant-
Le lundi 9 avril 2007 05:39, vous avez écrit :
> -1
>
> The uberjar does not work equivalently to the last release, as it
> does not contain the lightweight http wagon. I've filed this as
> MANTTASKS-64. I also noticed that the uberjar is larger than the
> previous one, despite omitting some things
On 21 Apr 07, at 2:22 PM 21 Apr 07, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Le lundi 9 avril 2007 05:39, vous avez écrit :
-1
The uberjar does not work equivalently to the last release, as it
does not contain the lightweight http wagon. I've filed this as
MANTTASKS-64. I also noticed that the uberjar is larger
Le samedi 21 avril 2007 22:09, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> I'll stage them again and you can test those:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant-
> tasks-2.0.6/
>
> If you find those to be all right then I'll call a vote again and
> we'll get them out.
No, there is a proble
On 21 Apr 07, at 5:30 PM 21 Apr 07, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Le samedi 21 avril 2007 22:09, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
I'll stage them again and you can test those:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant-
tasks-2.0.6/
If you find those to be all right then I'll call a vote a
Le dimanche 22 avril 2007 01:35, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> The build is fine and the jar is produced correctly. It's the release
> plugin causing the problem.
>
> We'll sort it out.
great. I don't see how I can help on code for the moment: tell me if I can do
anything.
I'll work on documentation
Le dimanche 22 avril 2007 08:42, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> I'll work on documentation enhancement, to reflect new features on
> http://maven.apache.org/ant-tasks.html
work done: a patch has been added to MANTTASKS-64
as written in the comment: "My (fr)english is not so good, you'll probably
need
On 22 Apr 07, at 3:58 AM 22 Apr 07, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Le dimanche 22 avril 2007 08:42, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
I'll work on documentation enhancement, to reflect new features on
http://maven.apache.org/ant-tasks.html
work done: a patch has been added to MANTTASKS-64
as written in the comm
Do people use the SSH deployment frequently? The documentation says
SSH deployment is supported but the 2.0.4-based tasks don't contain
any of the requirements for that.
Jason, you were talking to the Tomcat folks and I assume they will
need the SSH goodies to deploy so I can put the requir
Le dimanche 22 avril 2007 17:32, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> I staged the Ant Tasks to the same place and
> they look fine now.
I checked them today: they seem fine to me
Time for a second take ?
Hervé
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E
On 23 Apr 07, at 2:55 PM 23 Apr 07, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Le dimanche 22 avril 2007 17:32, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
I staged the Ant Tasks to the same place and
they look fine now.
I checked them today: they seem fine to me
Time for a second take ?
Yup, I guess I just wanted to see if anyon
Le lundi 23 avril 2007 21:00, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> > I checked them today: they seem fine to me
> > Time for a second take ?
>
> Yup, I guess I just wanted to see if anyone thought it wise to
> include the libraries necessary for SSH deployment. Currently you
> could not deploy via SSH without
On 23 Apr 07, at 3:12 PM 23 Apr 07, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Le lundi 23 avril 2007 21:00, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
I checked them today: they seem fine to me
Time for a second take ?
Yup, I guess I just wanted to see if anyone thought it wise to
include the libraries necessary for SSH deployment
Le lundi 23 avril 2007 22:05, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> > you mean:
> >
> > is not sufficient?
> >
> > and wagon-ftp? and wagon-webdav?
>
> Doesn't take much to make it that much easier.
ok, why not.
I tried to get how many KB each provider would add, to have figures
for "doesn't take much".
But
ok, I found why I had "Embedded error: duplicate entry:": when I add wagon-ssh
as a dependency, I get plexus:plexus-utils as a transitive dependency, which
conflicts with org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils.
Adding plexus:plexus-utils solved my problem.
Then, here are the figures (1.0-beta-2):
- wa
Nice, thanks.
I'm doing some Ant (well, a conversion) so I'll take a look as soon
as I can.
Thanks,
Jason.
On 26 Apr 07, at 4:45 PM 26 Apr 07, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
ok, I found why I had "Embedded error: duplicate entry:": when I
add wagon-ssh
as a dependency, I get plexus:plexus-utils a
Le jeudi 26 avril 2007, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> Nice, thanks.
>
> I'm doing some Ant (well, a conversion) so I'll take a look as soon
> as I can.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason.
Any news on Maven Ant Tasks?
What can I do to help release 2.0.6?
Hervé
--
+1
--jason
On May 15, 2007, at 6:15 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Repost of the vote after fixing the issues with the uber JAR that
was produced. Hervé and I have tried them and they appear to work
fine.
The staging repository is here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-reposito
+1 non-binding :)
Hervé
Le mercredi 16 mai 2007, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Repost of the vote after fixing the issues with the uber JAR that was
> produced. Hervé and I have tried them and they appear to work fine.
>
> The staging repository is here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/
+1
Stéphane
On 5/16/07, Hervé BOUTEMY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 non-binding :)
Hervé
Le mercredi 16 mai 2007, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Repost of the vote after fixing the issues with the uber JAR that was
> produced. Hervé and I have tried them and they appear to work fine.
>
> Th
+1 - tested successfully.
On 15/05/2007, at 6:15 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Repost of the vote after fixing the issues with the uber JAR that
was produced. Hervé and I have tried them and they appear to work
fine.
The staging repository is here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/stagi
What ever happened to this? Can we please get this released and
update the docs to explain to folks how to use it?
--jason
On 5/16/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 - tested successfully.
On 15/05/2007, at 6:15 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Repost of the vote after fixing
Yup, the 72 hours elapsed from the last vote. So I'll merge those
into the production repository.
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/
maven/maven-ant-tasks/
All deployed.
On 22 May 07, at 6:48 AM 22 May 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
What ever happened to this?
I think there is more than merging needed, the website needs to be
updated. And is there an uber jar or something for this? Previously
the jar for ant to include as maven-artifact-ant-2.0.4-dep.jar, now
there is just maven-ant-tasks-2.0.6.jar?
The info page should also be updated too:
Here is a little patch for the 3 pages that have to be updated in maven-site
and published.
The binaires are not yet in the distribution library
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/maven/binaries: I suppose this is
different from the production repository.
Hervé
Le mardi 22 mai 2007, Jason D
On 22 May 07, at 2:29 PM 22 May 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
I think there is more than merging needed,
Not sure what you mean. This is really the first release using this
artifact id.
the website needs to be updated. And is there an uber jar or
something for this? Previously the jar for a
On 22 May 07, at 5:10 PM 22 May 07, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Here is a little patch for the 3 pages that have to be updated in
maven-site
and published.
The binaires are not yet in the distribution library
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/maven/binaries: I suppose this is
different from the
Le mercredi 23 mai 2007, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> On 22 May 07, at 5:10 PM 22 May 07, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> > Here is a little patch for the 3 pages that have to be updated in
> > maven-site
> > and published.
> >
> > The binaires are not yet in the distribution library
> > http://www.apache.org/
43 matches
Mail list logo