Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Olivier Lamy, Arnaud Héritier
+0 (binding): Dennis Lundberg
+1 (non binding): Stephen Connolly
I will promote the artifacts to the central repository and continue with
the release.
Benjamin
-1
I tried these POMs with Java 1.4. Unfortunately the changes made in
r830510 by Vincent has created a Java 1.5 dependency on Maven Parent.
That's because Cobertura Maven Plugin 2.3 (specified in reporting
section of Maven Parent) depends upon Cobertura 1.9.2 which was compiled
with Java 1.5
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
-1
I tried these POMs with Java 1.4. Unfortunately the changes made in
r830510 by Vincent has created a Java 1.5 dependency on Maven Parent.
That's because Cobertura Maven Plugin 2.3 (specified in reporting
section of Maven Parent)
Is something preventing us from
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
-1
I tried these POMs with Java 1.4. Unfortunately the changes made in
r830510 by Vincent has created a Java 1.5 dependency on Maven Parent.
That's because Cobertura Maven Plugin 2.3 (specified in reporting
section of Maven Parent)
Is
+1
Arnaud
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
+1
--
Olivier
2009/10/30 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Hi,
if some of you have a déjà vu while regarding the mail title, that's
fine...
my previous attempt at making our release
Hi,
if some of you have a déjà vu while regarding the mail title, that's
fine... my previous attempt at making our release processes smoother
failed due to missing site descriptors in the deployment. So if you
liked the predecessor versions of the parents being voted on, I hope you
also like
+1 from me
-Stephen
2009/10/29 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
Hi,
if some of you have a déjà vu while regarding the mail title, that's
fine... my previous attempt at making our release processes smoother failed
due to missing site descriptors in the deployment. So if you liked
+1
--
Olivier
2009/10/30 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Hi,
if some of you have a déjà vu while regarding the mail title, that's fine...
my previous attempt at making our release processes smoother failed due to
missing site descriptors in the deployment. So if you liked the
