2008/5/22 Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mark, can we please have a big sign somewhere prominently on the site
informing users that Maven Runtime requires Java 5. I was not able to find
info on this on the staged site.
I think people have gotten used to Maven stuff requiring only Java
The whole business of revoting to change the site feels very wrong to
me.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 6:17 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Runtime 1.0-alpha-1 (take 2)
2008/5/22 Dennis
2008/5/29 Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The whole business of revoting to change the site feels very wrong to
me.
Yep, but it is part of the tag so I guess it's fair enough. Besides,
the last vote only had one +1 anyway.. :)
Mark
+1
Thanks,
--
Olivier
2008/5/21 Mark Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi there,
I'd like to attempt to release Maven Runtime 1.0-alpha-1 again. The
changes since the last vote are:
- Upgraded to Java 5
- Sped up tests
- Added site documentation and reports
- Tidied code and Javadoc
Staging
Mark, can we please have a big sign somewhere prominently on the site
informing users that Maven Runtime requires Java 5. I was not able to
find info on this on the staged site.
I think people have gotten used to Maven stuff requiring only Java 1.4.
So any product that we release that
Hi there,
I'd like to attempt to release Maven Runtime 1.0-alpha-1 again. The
changes since the last vote are:
- Upgraded to Java 5
- Sped up tests
- Added site documentation and reports
- Tidied code and Javadoc
Staging repo:
http://people.apache.org/~markh/staging-repo/
Staging site (not
